3,000 US soldiers (95.5% of total) killed since "Mission accomplished"

[○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└]

May 1st, 2003: 140 US soldiers dead


Feb. 19th, 2007: 3,140 US soldiers dead

If the mission was accomplished, why have 3,000 more US soldiers died?

95.5% of the US soldiers killed have been killed since "Mission Accomplished".

[○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└]

That didn't last long, 4 more just died.

[○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└]

Beating a dead horse when there are plenty of live ones.

Dead US soldiers = dead horses?

[○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└]

Beating a dead horse when there are plenty of live ones.

Dead US soldiers = dead horses?

Maybe if you hadn't replied less than a minute after I posted that, you would have taken the 10 seconds necessary for any competent person to understand that post.

You are a joke on a bad acid trip. Must you be a retard on every thread I post?

[○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└]

Wow, this stupid forum shows the brain-dead bandwagon on jfern bashing yet again.

[○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└]

Wow, this stupid forum shows the brain-dead bandwagon on jfern bashing yet again.

Looking at the bolded section there;

1. Why do you still come here?

2. Why can't you ever admit that you are frequently occasionally wrong?

Hey, idiot, where was I wrong?

[○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└]

No offense, but I have to agree with Alcon in that this is beating a dead horse.  This is at least the third or fourth time that someone has pointed out the number of soldiers killed since Bush made the amazingly dumb decision to say "mission accomplished".  If it didn't do anything then, it's not going to suddenly do something now.

In case you missed it, we're still in Iraq. I fail to see how Bush's "Mission Accomplished" isn't relevant any more. Alcon's point was pretty stupid. I wish he'd stop trolling my threads.

[○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└]

Wow, this stupid forum shows the brain-dead bandwagon on jfern bashing yet again.

Looking at the bolded section there;

1. Why do you still come here?

2. Why can't you ever admit that you are frequently occasionally wrong?

Hey, idiot, where was I wrong?

Remember the 'rolodex scandal'?  The premature death of King Fahd?  Your outright refusal to spell certain words correctly?  Your completely false attribution of opinions to myself and others, with no apology?

It's honestly okay to admit when you're wrong from time to time, and to take it on the chin.  I find a self-deprecating joke sometimes helps.  These are merely tips that might help explain why most people on here resort to 'jfern-bashing', as you put it.  To put it simply, your habit of lashing out at people with insults provides very little reason for people you disagree with to maintain any kind of respect for you.

Also, you didn't answer my first question.

Rolodex - Wow, I used a wrong word a couple of years ago, and admitted I was wrong.
King Fahd -  FauxNews reported that'
Misspelled words - Who the hell cares?

Now, this forum incorrectly has argued that I was wrong when I right zillions of times. Remember the coin tossing? They never admitted I was right there.

Now, please STFU.