Why are we not expanding the house numbers? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 29, 2024, 05:38:13 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Political Geography & Demographics (Moderators: muon2, 100% pro-life no matter what)
  Why are we not expanding the house numbers? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Why are we not expanding the house numbers?  (Read 812 times)
○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└
jfern
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 53,859


Political Matrix
E: -7.38, S: -8.36

« on: November 13, 2020, 11:51:55 PM »

It would take an act of Congress to expand the House, and more representatives would mean less power for each individual representative. Of course they're perfectly happy to keep the number fixed. That's why there was an amendment proposed in the Bill of Rights that would have limited the population per district. If only the Founders had thought of the cube root rule...

We should all be glad that Madison's harebrained idea didn't pass. One representative for every 50,000 Americans would require a US House the size of a small town.

It just says at least 50k per district. It would allow any number from 200-6600 districts.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.019 seconds with 12 queries.