Why is China horrendously underrepresented in WWII discussion? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 27, 2024, 08:22:33 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Discussion
  History (Moderator: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee)
  Why is China horrendously underrepresented in WWII discussion? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Why is China horrendously underrepresented in WWII discussion?  (Read 1189 times)
○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└
jfern
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 53,850


Political Matrix
E: -7.38, S: -8.36

« on: September 04, 2020, 09:30:12 PM »

China had wars pretty much nonstop from 1912-1953 (counting the Korean war).
Logged
○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└
jfern
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 53,850


Political Matrix
E: -7.38, S: -8.36

« Reply #1 on: September 05, 2020, 03:40:01 AM »
« Edited: September 05, 2020, 03:44:37 AM by ○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└ »

Cold War era propaganda revisionism and Western Bias.

You hit the nail on the head in my opinion.

Of course the Cold War revisionism (denialism?) starts with never actually prosecuting Hirohito, Shiro Ishii (!), and the like.

Of course the myth is that the Japanese surrender had everything to with the US nukes and nothing to do with the Soviet Union invasion and that the Emperor was a figurehead who had nothing to do with the war. It worked out well for the emperor and the US. The irony is that the deadliest one day bombing of a city in world history was Japan in 1945, but Tokyo with conventional weapons. The nukes just didn't have the impact we like to imagine.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.018 seconds with 12 queries.