The “Who is running in 2020?” tea leaves thread, Part 3 (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 16, 2024, 09:30:02 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2020 U.S. Presidential Election (Moderators: Likely Voter, YE)
  The “Who is running in 2020?” tea leaves thread, Part 3 (search mode)
Pages: 1 [2]
Author Topic: The “Who is running in 2020?” tea leaves thread, Part 3  (Read 176522 times)
○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└
jfern
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 53,938


Political Matrix
E: -7.38, S: -8.36

« Reply #25 on: February 28, 2019, 06:44:36 PM »

I feel bad for Eric Swalwell, he seems like a nice guy and is a progressive FF, but his 2020 campaign will be such a dud. He is just some random congressman from CA. His Facebook live event had less than 30 views. He will go down as a Jim Gilmore type figure.

It's kind of hilarious that the 3 representatives from Alameda county will consist of a candidate and co-chair for 2 other campaigns.
Logged
○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└
jfern
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 53,938


Political Matrix
E: -7.38, S: -8.36

« Reply #26 on: March 07, 2019, 03:30:27 PM »


I have no idea why the guys with the lowest name ID are waiting the longest. Considering the debate criteria they should be getting in as early as possible.

Delaney has been campaigning for 2 years, and he was 0% in the latest poll, so it doesn't really matter.
Logged
○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└
jfern
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 53,938


Political Matrix
E: -7.38, S: -8.36

« Reply #27 on: March 11, 2019, 08:36:36 PM »

Swalwell sticking to "end of the month":




I assume anyone announcing at the end of the quarter will probably set it up so they don't report anything to the FEC for the quarter.
Logged
○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└
jfern
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 53,938


Political Matrix
E: -7.38, S: -8.36

« Reply #28 on: March 15, 2019, 06:12:35 PM »

Bullock reiterates that while he might run for president, he has no interest in a run for Senate:

https://www.montanafreepress.org/mt-lowdown-podcast-gov-steve-bullock-looks-back-on-his-political-career-discusses-legislative-priorities-and-discusses-2020/

Quote
Bullock acknowledged that some in his party have urged him to challenge Daines, but he thinks there are other Democrats who could take that seat. Besides, he says, he doesn’t want that job.   

“I’ve expressed all along [that] I just don’t have an interest in running for U.S. Senate,” Bullock said. “I think that my skill set, and what I’ve done, I just wouldn’t enjoy it, so I’d ruled it out.”


Damn...Democrats really could have used another potential pickup opportunity.

And his odds in the Presidential primary are so bad that he'd have a much better chance of becoming Senator than President.
Logged
Pages: 1 [2]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.03 seconds with 13 queries.