DNC faces fundrasing shortage (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 14, 2024, 12:41:27 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  U.S. General Discussion (Moderators: The Dowager Mod, Chancellor Tanterterg)
  DNC faces fundrasing shortage (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: DNC faces fundrasing shortage  (Read 2512 times)
○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└
jfern
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 53,933


Political Matrix
E: -7.38, S: -8.36

« on: October 22, 2017, 05:56:08 PM »

The RNC has been doing well.

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.
Logged
○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└
jfern
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 53,933


Political Matrix
E: -7.38, S: -8.36

« Reply #1 on: October 22, 2017, 06:31:41 PM »
« Edited: October 22, 2017, 06:34:12 PM by ○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└ »

The DNC isn’t what needs the money right now, folks.

LOL at the spin that somehow that $8 million fundraising advantage the Democrats have in the House and Senate committees makes up for a $47 million disadvantage in the national committees.

Also, Republicans still have more total cash on hands for the congressional committees.

http://classic.fec.gov/disclosure/partySummary.do
Logged
○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└
jfern
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 53,933


Political Matrix
E: -7.38, S: -8.36

« Reply #2 on: October 22, 2017, 06:36:28 PM »

The RNC has been doing well.

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.
But politicians praised Nancy because she could fundraise. Looks like that was code for fudraise for our consultants.

Both of you are ignoring how well the DCCC has been doing in terms of fundraising. But that would go against the narrative your trying to create.

Already addressed, and the DCCC has a $9 million cash on hand disadvantage. Maybe they shouldn't have blown so much money on Jon Ossoff?
Logged
○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└
jfern
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 53,933


Political Matrix
E: -7.38, S: -8.36

« Reply #3 on: October 22, 2017, 07:05:12 PM »

The DNC isn’t what needs the money right now, folks.

LOL at the spin that somehow that $8 million fundraising advantage the Democrats have in the House and Senate committees makes up for a $47 million disadvantage in the national committees.

Also, Republicans still have more total cash on hands for the congressional committees.

http://classic.fec.gov/disclosure/partySummary.do
Disbursement to special elections is drastically higher. Money isn't doing any good just sitting in the DCCC's accounts. And as long as fundrasing continues near or at current levels, it isn't a problem.

Then again, I shouldn't expect anything less from a Leninist.

Oh, spending money intelligently is one thing, but that did not describe the money wasted on Jon Ossoff, while ignoring the 3 other races, 2 of which had Berniecrats.
Logged
○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└
jfern
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 53,933


Political Matrix
E: -7.38, S: -8.36

« Reply #4 on: October 22, 2017, 08:16:54 PM »

Aren't House Democratic candidates outraising Republican candidates/incumbents across the board right now? The DCCC/DSCC's numbers are fine, and if the DNC wanted more money, then they should stop sucking so much. As for Republicans, doesn't it make sense that they would be raking in more cash, given that they control the entire federal government?

Yeah, but don't tell Republican troll jfern that. The Party in power is kinda supposed to be raking it in. If they weren't, that'd be particularly embarrassing. Jfern just wants to pretend he's some sort of liberal Bernie Bro (somehow) still bitter about 2016, but I think it's become quite clear that s/he's just a Republican in disguise.

Telling people who criticize establishment Democrats that they must be a Republican isn't helping. How about not having establishment Democrats suck? The DNC told Bernie people to go screw themselves, so no surprise that they stopped donating.
Logged
○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└
jfern
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 53,933


Political Matrix
E: -7.38, S: -8.36

« Reply #5 on: October 22, 2017, 10:29:47 PM »

Aren't House Democratic candidates outraising Republican candidates/incumbents across the board right now? The DCCC/DSCC's numbers are fine, and if the DNC wanted more money, then they should stop sucking so much. As for Republicans, doesn't it make sense that they would be raking in more cash, given that they control the entire federal government?

Yes and it is getting to the point that the GOP is starting to worry.

https://www.nationaljournal.com/s/659667?unlock=FALH9NUB4D9E32M2

Of course this goes against jfern's narrative.....

People feel differently about giving money to individual candidates than to the party itself, obviously.
Logged
○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└
jfern
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 53,933


Political Matrix
E: -7.38, S: -8.36

« Reply #6 on: October 23, 2017, 12:19:23 AM »

Wasn't Perez supposed to be amazing in fundraising ?

They probably would have canned Ellison by now if he had numbers anywhere near this bad.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.035 seconds with 10 queries.