Arctic Ice Cap melting

[○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└]

Global warming is here.

http://north.cbc.ca/regional/servlet/View?filename=arctic-ice-29072005

[○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└]

Ostriches.

[○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└]

A very good read

So you're saying that since it's not "fact" because there isn't enough "evidence", we should ignore the problem? I really hope you opposed the Iraq war. We wouldn't want you to be the world's biggest hypocrite.

[○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└]

A very good read

So you're saying that since it's not "fact" because there isn't enough "evidence", we should ignore the problem? I really hope you opposed the Iraq war. We wouldn't want you to be the world's biggest hypocrite.

I hope you supported it since you seem to be saying here that a lack of evidence means we should act immediately and rashly.

As for the war, I believed the CIA evidence.

I never said we need to act immediately and rashing. You are a pathetic intellectually dishonest hypocrite, Mr. 94% correlation is always insignificant.

[○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└]

A very good read

So you're saying that since it's not "fact" because there isn't enough "evidence", we should ignore the problem? I really hope you opposed the Iraq war. We wouldn't want you to be the world's biggest hypocrite.

I hope you supported it since you seem to be saying here that a lack of evidence means we should act immediately and rashly.

As for the war, I believed the CIA evidence.

I never said we need to act immediately and rashing. You are a pathetic intellectually dishonest hypocrite, Mr. 94% correlation is always insignificant.

I am basing this on previous statements of yours in other threads.

Keep bringing up the correlation stuff.  It really helps your credibility.

Your stance seems to be we have no real world evidence here, so global warming is real.

We had evidence on Iraq, so it must be false.

I'm done though.  Out smarting you is no longer fun and was never challenging.  I'll leave it to other people.

I will move on to more challenging intellectual opponents, like my 6 month old nephew, or my dog.  Or StatesRights™.


P.S.  If you want to do one of those things where you challenge someone to contradict you, wait ten minutes, then post that their lack of response proves that you were right all along, now would be a good time since I won't respond.  I figure your frail, little ego could use a little boosting.

You do realize that you and J.J. were wrong on the statistics? Anyone who know statistics knows that you and J.J. are wrong, 94% heads and a 94% correlation are statistically significant if you have enough data points. You guys have no credibility or intellectual honesty.  Bush lied on Iraq. You are a hypocrite for beliving someone who had already been busted repeatedly for lying, while thinking that global warming is crap.

[○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└]

You do realize that you and J.J. were wrong on the statistics? Anyone who know statistics knows that you and J.J. are wrong, 94% heads and a 94% correlation are statistically significant if you have enough data points. You guys have no credibility or intellectual honesty.  Bush lied on Iraq. You are a hypocrite for beliving someone who had already been busted repeatedly for lying, while thinking that global warming is crap.

With the exception of the last 6 words, absolutely none of that has anything to do with the issue of global warming, and none of it disproves his arguments regarding global warming.

I am just point out that he has no credibility. Why should I argue things that aren't black and white with him, when he can't accept absolute truth (that 94% correlation can be significant)?

[○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└]

You do realize that you and J.J. were wrong on the statistics? Anyone who know statistics knows that you and J.J. are wrong, 94% heads and a 94% correlation are statistically significant if you have enough data points. You guys have no credibility or intellectual honesty.  Bush lied on Iraq. You are a hypocrite for beliving someone who had already been busted repeatedly for lying, while thinking that global warming is crap.

With the exception of the last 6 words, absolutely none of that has anything to do with the issue of global warming, and none of it disproves his arguments regarding global warming.

No, but it might be indicitive Jfern's mental state and an exceptionally good argument about why we shouldn't listen to him.  :-)

Whatever you say, Mr-94%-heads-and-94%-correlation-are-always-insignificant.

[○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└]

You do realize that you and J.J. were wrong on the statistics? Anyone who know statistics knows that you and J.J. are wrong, 94% heads and a 94% correlation are statistically significant if you have enough data points. You guys have no credibility or intellectual honesty.  Bush lied on Iraq. You are a hypocrite for beliving someone who had already been busted repeatedly for lying, while thinking that global warming is crap.

With the exception of the last 6 words, absolutely none of that has anything to do with the issue of global warming, and none of it disproves his arguments regarding global warming.

No, but it might be indicitive Jfern's mental state and an exceptionally good argument about why we shouldn't listen to him.  :-)

Whatever you say, Mr-94%-heads-and-94%-correlation-are-always-insignificant.

You just illustrated the point, again.

What point? That you are a hack who can't ever admit defeat no matter how overwhelming the evidence against you?