Intelligent design belongs in Church not Biology class. (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 02, 2024, 04:48:45 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Political Debate (Moderator: Torie)
  Intelligent design belongs in Church not Biology class. (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Intelligent design belongs in Church not Biology class.  (Read 15244 times)
○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└
jfern
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 53,879


Political Matrix
E: -7.38, S: -8.36

« on: June 23, 2005, 01:08:47 AM »

I agree completely with MissCatholic. The theory of Intelligent design has no place within a biology class whether the 'designer' in question is a god or an alien race!

Then throw out the THEORY of Evolution as well. Evolution is certainly junk science in my book.

Clearly since it has the word Theory, it must be false, along with the Theory of General Relativity, and Quantum Theory.
Logged
○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└
jfern
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 53,879


Political Matrix
E: -7.38, S: -8.36

« Reply #1 on: June 25, 2005, 12:49:06 AM »



Quite right. Stuff like this goes hypothesis->theory->law. Hypothesis only has a few observations to back it up, but nothing completely solid and little if any study done. Theory has a larger number of observations and study to indicate it is at least partially correct. Law has had enough done to where it can be certain all aspects of it are correct.

There was the law of gravity, but it got bumped down to theory because we don't understand fully it's mechanics and effects in certain situations(moving close to light speed or ultra-high gravity, if I'm not mistaken). So, gravity is only a theory. Wink

There's no difference between theory and law in that context. It's the THEORY of General Relativity, and Quantum THEORY.
Logged
○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└
jfern
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 53,879


Political Matrix
E: -7.38, S: -8.36

« Reply #2 on: July 07, 2005, 06:46:38 AM »


Just correcting your logic here - Intelligent Design makes no mention of any particular God or religion, it simply states that an outside force(probably divine in nature) was the cause for gradual changes in species.

Correct, Intelligent Design doesn't mention religion, but it appeals to the creationists as a way to try to market creationism and not have it look like creationism. The fact is that Intelligent Design has no scientific evidence, and is not a scientific theory, and so doesn't belong in a science class.
Logged
○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└
jfern
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 53,879


Political Matrix
E: -7.38, S: -8.36

« Reply #3 on: July 07, 2005, 06:28:23 PM »


Ok, debate the historical record if you wish. Although it hasn't been proven that EVERY animal was put on a boat. It certainly is very plausible their WAS a flood. And it's been proven re : Black Sea.

It would have had to be a very high flood for yaks to have been affected.
Logged
○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└
jfern
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 53,879


Political Matrix
E: -7.38, S: -8.36

« Reply #4 on: August 09, 2005, 01:44:01 PM »

Terms like macro-evolution and Darwinists are only used by creationists.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.028 seconds with 10 queries.