Who are worse? Hillary Hacks or Bernie Hacks?

[○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└]

If you really think Lief is worse than ProgressiveCanadian or jfern, you are an idiot.

You make a good case, but probably not the one you wanted to.

[○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└]

Hillary hacks seem to have a sense of humor, at least, and understand the candidate in question is a human being. Berniebots are so serious that their guy is Jesus Christ himself, and they seem like they will have a mental breakdown if Bernard does not win every single primary.

Bernie has flaws. For one he's too pro-Israel. And I think SC is safe Hillary.

[○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└]

Hillary supporters aren't having articles written about them:
http://www.bbc.com/news/blogs-trending-35422316

I actually like Bernie - I just prefer Hillary more. But every one of my friends on social media push multiple Bernie articles a day. Comments up the wazoo. I don't bother responding because they aren't open to differing viewpoints.

The other interesting dynamic is that most Hillary supporters state that if Bernie becomes the nominee, they would vote for him.

I've seen a plenty of Bernie supporters state that if Hillary is the nominee, they will vote 3rd party or not vote at all. I think various polls are also supporting this view when the question is asked.

Yous see articles like that Hillary's campaign has been running against Bernie supporters. Bernie isn't running a campaign against Hillary supporters. Anyways, these claims of sexism are stage 4 of the establishment backlash, you should be on stage 6 like everyone else now.

https://theintercept.com/2016/01/21/the-seven-stages-of-establishment-backlash-corbynsanders-edition/