Were there any big cities in the South pre-1860? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 12, 2024, 11:54:35 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Political Geography & Demographics (Moderators: muon2, 100% pro-life no matter what)
  Were there any big cities in the South pre-1860? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Were there any big cities in the South pre-1860?  (Read 12823 times)
○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└
jfern
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 53,925


Political Matrix
E: -7.38, S: -8.36

« on: September 15, 2014, 12:01:26 AM »
« edited: September 15, 2014, 12:03:09 AM by ○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└ »

The two big southern cities were

Charleston - In 1790, it was the 4th largest city, behind New York, Philadelphia, and Boston. It had 16,359 people. After 1840, it was no longer top 10.
New Orleans - In 1840, it was the 3rd largest city, behind only New York and Baltimore. It had 103,193 people. It was top 10 through 1880.

Not until Houston in 1960 would another southern city be top 10.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.017 seconds with 10 queries.