California Predictions (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 12, 2024, 12:52:06 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Gubernatorial/State Elections (Moderators: Brittain33, GeorgiaModerate, Gass3268, Virginiá, Gracile)
  California Predictions (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: California Predictions  (Read 3169 times)
Citizen James
James42
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,540


Political Matrix
E: -3.87, S: -2.78

« on: November 04, 2005, 08:16:54 PM »

I know two posters have already made their predictions in Another thread, but I'm curious as to anyone else following the propositions.  Given the wide difference between the polling compaines (field and SUSA), there is a lot of speculation here.

For background information, there is the Official voter guide, and the League of women voters guide

I have a limited knowledge about the tv campaigns, as I only watch one show on local networks (Jeopardy).   

My predicitions (fwiw):

73: Parental notification.  Passes narrowly (51-49).  Though there will be a lot of knee jerk votes against it from the more ferverent of the pro-choicers, I think the proponents of parental notification are more orginized.  The PAC opposing the 'Arnold' measures isn't touching this one with a ten foot pole.

74: Teacher Tenure.  Fails solidly (41-59).  Teachers are generally well regarded in California, and thier union is one of the most powerful in the state. Linking the highly unpopular governor Schwartzenegger to the measure pretty much dooms it.

75: Union dues.  Fails solidly (39-61).  See 74, but add Firefighters and Police into the list of opponents.

76: State spending and school funding.  Fails(45-55).  This benefits a little from the frustration about the budget problems, but loses favor with those who don't want school funding slasher nor want to give the governor more power over the budget.

77: Redistricting.  Fails closely  (47-53).  People know the state is gerrymandered to the hilt, but it's the devil you know against the devil you don't, and the implied linkage to Arnold weakens it signifigantly.

78: Drug discounts (industry):  Fails  (46-54).  Game theory at work here, the divide and conquer method will insure both measures of failing, though the better funded one (this one) will do better.

79 Drug discounts (labor) Fails (44-56). Same reasoning as 78.

80: Electricity reregulation.  Fails strongly (29-71).  A lack of knowedge kills this on outright.  People tend to vote against measures they don't understand.  Plus, a number of voters will likely be voting no across the board as a protest against the special election.

Anyone else?
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.03 seconds with 12 queries.