538 Model Megathread (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 09, 2024, 12:28:55 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2016 U.S. Presidential Election
  538 Model Megathread (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: 538 Model Megathread  (Read 85719 times)
Mehmentum
Icefire9
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,605
United States


« on: July 21, 2016, 11:29:30 AM »

Lol, the OP is literally bragging about their candidate having a 39% chance of winning.  Sad!
Logged
Mehmentum
Icefire9
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,605
United States


« Reply #1 on: August 01, 2016, 05:39:38 PM »

I enjoyed this description of what each of the forecasts are 'thinking' right now.

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.
Logged
Mehmentum
Icefire9
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,605
United States


« Reply #2 on: August 18, 2016, 03:26:23 PM »

A couple polls came out today that, while having Clinton in the lead, were less than glorious for her, yet the model doesn't seem to have budged since yesterday. Anyone know why?
538 takes into account where each individual poll previously had the candidate.

For example, Rasmussen had Clinton's margin down 1 point from their last poll.  Yougov's poll has the same margin as earlier in the month. The Reuters poll only has a 1 point drop from the previous poll.
Logged
Mehmentum
Icefire9
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,605
United States


« Reply #3 on: August 18, 2016, 03:32:56 PM »

Somewhat off-topic, but 538 cites this website throughout the attached article. Have they done that before?

http://fivethirtyeight.com/features/election-update-why-clinton-doesnt-have-this-race-locked-up/
Yep, they've done it several times before.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.028 seconds with 12 queries.