IBD/TIPP nat. poll: D: Clinton 45% Sanders 43%; R: Trump 31% Cruz 20% Rubio 18% (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 23, 2024, 05:43:49 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2016 U.S. Presidential Primary Election Polls
  IBD/TIPP nat. poll: D: Clinton 45% Sanders 43%; R: Trump 31% Cruz 20% Rubio 18% (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: IBD/TIPP nat. poll: D: Clinton 45% Sanders 43%; R: Trump 31% Cruz 20% Rubio 18%  (Read 1777 times)
Mehmentum
Icefire9
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,600
United States


« on: February 25, 2016, 10:12:47 AM »

You guys do realize that we have plenty of statewide polls from outside the south, right?  Recent New Jersey, Ohio, Illinios, Michigan, and Pennsylvania polls all have Clinton up by double digits.
Logged
Mehmentum
Icefire9
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,600
United States


« Reply #1 on: February 25, 2016, 10:24:33 AM »

You guys do realize that we have plenty of statewide polls from outside the south, right?  Recent New Jersey, Ohio, Illinios, Michigan, and Pennsylvania polls all have Clinton up by double digits.

Yea Ohio polls are mixed the Midwest is where Sanders needs tp play he could easily make Illinois competitive as well. Also new jersey is months and months away nice try.
You are completely missing the point. 

The poll indicates that Sanders is winning the midwest right now.  How on earth is the possibility of Sanders closing the gap in the future relevant?  Its not.  How on earth is when a primary contest is held relevant to the accuracy of the poll's results, when the poll's methodology is completely blind to when the state's contest is held? Its not. 

And the fact that you can literally only point to a single midwestern poll where Sanders is not down by double digits proves my point.
Logged
Mehmentum
Icefire9
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,600
United States


« Reply #2 on: February 25, 2016, 10:59:46 AM »

You guys do realize that we have plenty of statewide polls from outside the south, right?  Recent New Jersey, Ohio, Illinios, Michigan, and Pennsylvania polls all have Clinton up by double digits.

Yea Ohio polls are mixed the Midwest is where Sanders needs tp play he could easily make Illinois competitive as well. Also new jersey is months and months away nice try.
You are completely missing the point. 

The poll indicates that Sanders is winning the midwest right now.  How on earth is the possibility of Sanders closing the gap in the future relevant?  Its not.  How on earth is when a primary contest is held relevant to the accuracy of the poll's results, when the poll's methodology is completely blind to when the state's contest is held? Its not. 

And the fact that you can literally only point to a single midwestern poll where Sanders is not down by double digits proves my point.

So it seems as though another Clinton supporter hates a poll showing her barley ahead nationally. If Sanders picks up more then a few states on Super Tuesday that would give him plenty of enough momentum. Also Ohio is mixed i would not call it a double digit win for anyone. Minnesota could easily give Sanders a big win. There are plenty of states that have not been polled regularly but it seems as though you love to cherry pick the ones that everyone else calls junk.
Irony.
Logged
Mehmentum
Icefire9
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,600
United States


« Reply #3 on: February 25, 2016, 12:31:28 PM »

You guys do realize that we have plenty of statewide polls from outside the south, right?  Recent New Jersey, Ohio, Illinios, Michigan, and Pennsylvania polls all have Clinton up by double digits.

Yea Ohio polls are mixed the Midwest is where Sanders needs tp play he could easily make Illinois competitive as well. Also new jersey is months and months away nice try.
You are completely missing the point. 

The poll indicates that Sanders is winning the midwest right now.  How on earth is the possibility of Sanders closing the gap in the future relevant?  Its not.  How on earth is when a primary contest is held relevant to the accuracy of the poll's results, when the poll's methodology is completely blind to when the state's contest is held? Its not. 

And the fact that you can literally only point to a single midwestern poll where Sanders is not down by double digits proves my point.

So it seems as though another Clinton supporter hates a poll showing her barley ahead nationally. If Sanders picks up more then a few states on Super Tuesday that would give him plenty of enough momentum. Also Ohio is mixed i would not call it a double digit win for anyone. Minnesota could easily give Sanders a big win. There are plenty of states that have not been polled regularly but it seems as though you love to cherry pick the ones that everyone else calls junk.
Irony.

Obviously no response cause you have none. You are another one of the hacks that needs a Hillary logo. Still to early to call this race.
Again, irony.
Logged
Mehmentum
Icefire9
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,600
United States


« Reply #4 on: February 25, 2016, 12:48:44 PM »

You guys do realize that we have plenty of statewide polls from outside the south, right?  Recent New Jersey, Ohio, Illinios, Michigan, and Pennsylvania polls all have Clinton up by double digits.

Yea Ohio polls are mixed the Midwest is where Sanders needs tp play he could easily make Illinois competitive as well. Also new jersey is months and months away nice try.
You are completely missing the point. 

The poll indicates that Sanders is winning the midwest right now.  How on earth is the possibility of Sanders closing the gap in the future relevant?  Its not.  How on earth is when a primary contest is held relevant to the accuracy of the poll's results, when the poll's methodology is completely blind to when the state's contest is held? Its not. 

And the fact that you can literally only point to a single midwestern poll where Sanders is not down by double digits proves my point.

So it seems as though another Clinton supporter hates a poll showing her barley ahead nationally. If Sanders picks up more then a few states on Super Tuesday that would give him plenty of enough momentum. Also Ohio is mixed i would not call it a double digit win for anyone. Minnesota could easily give Sanders a big win. There are plenty of states that have not been polled regularly but it seems as though you love to cherry pick the ones that everyone else calls junk.
Irony.

Obviously no response cause you have none. You are another one of the hacks that needs a Hillary logo. Still to early to call this race.
Again, irony.

I have one hack.
Thats not what I was referring to.  Your 'response' to my rebuttal was to simply repeat that Ohio polls are mixed and that Sanders has momentum, adding nothing to the conversation. Thus, the irony.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.035 seconds with 13 queries.