Consumer Choice. (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 09, 2024, 08:40:11 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Economics (Moderator: Torie)
  Consumer Choice. (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Consumer Choice.  (Read 1027 times)
Redalgo
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,681
United States


WWW
« on: February 15, 2012, 01:08:33 PM »

I think consumer choice is a wonderful thing, but in my opinion it has three major limitations:

1. Consumers lack the resources and mental faculties required to make perfectly rational decisions.
2. Consumers who utilize goods and services in a reckless manner threaten to harm fellow people.
3. Consumers' pursuits of self interest may very easily come into conflict with those of communities.

Whether markets are capitalist or socialist, I think a regulatory (albeit flawed) role for state is vital.
Logged
Redalgo
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,681
United States


WWW
« Reply #1 on: February 17, 2012, 08:33:31 PM »

Yes, I did... and then for others in acknowledgment of the fallibility of human beings. Maybe you misread something, or consider it as less of a problem, but so far as I can tell I really didn't type anything controversial - especially since I am not advocating a command economy or arguing for the rejection of a market economy here.
Logged
Redalgo
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,681
United States


WWW
« Reply #2 on: February 18, 2012, 12:47:30 AM »
« Edited: February 18, 2012, 01:01:31 AM by Redalgo »

With respect, the point is not that consumers are dumb and dangerous. They are simply flawed economic actors, which I feel warrants saying. I seldom see it acknowledged when discussing political economy with people. Public officials suffer from limitations of their own that are no less serious and guarantee that the policy-making process is riddled with imperfections, as well. We really have to make do with what we have got. That is not propaganda - merely an observation. Using a handful of sentences to decide what I give a group of people credit for is presumptuous.

I am pro-government. The state is useful as a tool for moderating social conflict and upholding social rights. This tool is not useful for everything but that does not mean we need to throw it away or be afraid of using it in a limited capacity. I do not think an industry has to be privately owned and thoroughly deregulated to function well for the benefit of the individual and society alike. If that makes me anti-free enterprise, then so what? One can express some criticism of consumers and still place a moderate measure of trust in them and fancy markets, you know. Tongue
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.019 seconds with 11 queries.