NYT: California's Far North Deplores 'Tyranny' of the Urban Majority (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 01, 2024, 10:55:02 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  U.S. General Discussion (Moderators: The Dowager Mod, Chancellor Tanterterg)
  NYT: California's Far North Deplores 'Tyranny' of the Urban Majority (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: NYT: California's Far North Deplores 'Tyranny' of the Urban Majority  (Read 4107 times)
krazen1211
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,372


« on: July 04, 2017, 03:45:10 PM »

These fine folks should file to have their districts protected by the Voting Rights Act.
Logged
krazen1211
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,372


« Reply #1 on: July 06, 2017, 08:46:32 AM »

These fine folks should file to have their districts protected by the Voting Rights Act.

Why bother?   They already get their own district: CA-1

Districts, plural. One is nice and two is better. The claim would start with Del Norte County being made to suffer agony by being placed into Congressional and legislative districts thrust into the Bay Area rather than obtaining representation of their own values and interests. The same is true with Trinity County in the state Senate map.
Logged
krazen1211
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,372


« Reply #2 on: July 06, 2017, 02:14:01 PM »

These fine folks should file to have their districts protected by the Voting Rights Act.

Why bother?   They already get their own district: CA-1

Districts, plural. One is nice and two is better. The claim would start with Del Norte County being made to suffer agony by being placed into Congressional and legislative districts thrust into the Bay Area rather than obtaining representation of their own values and interests. The same is true with Trinity County in the state Senate map.

So take Nevada county out of CA-1 and put all tiny Republican counties you want into it, lol.   CA-1 is underpopulated and in decline anyway, they could just add Del Norte outright and not much else would need to be changed.



The original post, as quoted, describes this portion of California as 3% of the population, or proportionally, 1.59 Congressional districts. Or, alternatively, 2.4 Assembly districts.

In order to allot such territory one Congressional district, as you yourself admit, the mappers naturally needed to disperse the remaining .59 Congressional districts among various Congressional districts stretching to the Bay Area and Sacremento. California's 2nd District stretches up the coast, and California's 3rd Congressional district also stretches from the Bay Area to Glenn County.

It's a textbook pack and crack job...and not a bad one either I suppose.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.027 seconds with 12 queries.