NC-PPP: McCrory still popular, Assembly not (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 19, 2024, 04:43:51 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Gubernatorial/State Elections (Moderators: Brittain33, GeorgiaModerate, Gass3268, Virginiá, Gracile)
  NC-PPP: McCrory still popular, Assembly not (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: NC-PPP: McCrory still popular, Assembly not  (Read 1918 times)
krazen1211
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,372


« on: April 28, 2013, 04:45:33 PM »


Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

To retake a chamber, what would be the lead?

~8 points, but it's hard to say for certain. A lot of people say they prefer one party but then vote for their incumbent of the other party.

Democrats were leading by a similar 45/43 edge going into November 2012 and still ended up with just 35% of the total Assembly seats.

Their lead is going to have to be at least 10-11 points before they can seriously contest either chamber. Thats how brutal the maps are.

But how did they do in the actual popular vote?

http://www.wfae.org/post/pols-adept-picking-voters

If all of the state Senate votes for Democratic and Republican candidates were added up across the state, Democrats garnered 47 percent to Republican’s 53 percent.  But Republicans ended up with 66 percent of the seats to the Democrats’ 34 percent, creating a disproportionate advantage for the Republican party.

In the state House, a similar pattern emerged: Republican candidates garnered 51 percent of the total statewide vote, but won 64 percent of the seats in the chamber.




The GOP won both chambers.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.019 seconds with 12 queries.