NE2: Housing Deregulation Act (Failed) (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 23, 2024, 04:36:03 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Government
  Regional Governments (Moderators: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee, Lumine)
  NE2: Housing Deregulation Act (Failed) (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: NE2: Housing Deregulation Act (Failed)  (Read 1336 times)
Napoleon
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,892


« on: April 20, 2014, 03:23:16 PM »

The bill as written is marginally effective at best. See clause 1. It prohibits the Assembly from passing a certain type of law. That doesn't really work.
Logged
Napoleon
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,892


« Reply #1 on: April 21, 2014, 10:49:05 PM »

I plan to vote against this because I don't see a serious problem with the current system and I don't think this bill will do anything more than give landlords and megacorps more power. Generally things like this are the domain of the community because it affects those beyond the individual landowner
Logged
Napoleon
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,892


« Reply #2 on: April 21, 2014, 10:56:12 PM »

I plan to vote against this because I don't see a serious problem with the current system and I don't think this bill will do anything more than give landlords and megacorps more power. Generally things like this are the domain of the community because it affects those beyond the individual landowner
How will this bill benefit mega-corporations? I could understand saying that getting rid of maximum lot size ordinances would benefit them but I already amended the bill to take that part out.

As for landlords, I assume you're referring to Section 1, Subsection a? I've already provided evidence that rent control a harmful policy that leads to housing shortages.

I'm not very comfortable with D or F either. It would suck if DC was in our region and we set out to do this. Capitalism would destroy the city's character.
Logged
Napoleon
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,892


« Reply #3 on: April 21, 2014, 11:25:56 PM »

I plan to vote against this because I don't see a serious problem with the current system and I don't think this bill will do anything more than give landlords and megacorps more power. Generally things like this are the domain of the community because it affects those beyond the individual landowner
How will this bill benefit mega-corporations? I could understand saying that getting rid of maximum lot size ordinances would benefit them but I already amended the bill to take that part out.

As for landlords, I assume you're referring to Section 1, Subsection a? I've already provided evidence that rent control a harmful policy that leads to housing shortages.

I'm not very comfortable with D or F either. It would suck if DC was in our region and we set out to do this. Capitalism would destroy the city's character.
I already amended the bill to get rid of Subsection F. How would Subsection D destroy DC?

DC has height restrictions to prevent Manhattan style skyscrapers from crowding the city.  I agree with sirnick to an extent that communities should be able to establish certain rules and regulations. Is rent control your main issue?
Logged
Napoleon
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,892


« Reply #4 on: April 22, 2014, 02:43:19 PM »

Nay
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.02 seconds with 11 queries.