SENATE BILL: Firearms Act of 2013 (Law'd) (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 09, 2024, 09:28:00 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Government (Moderators: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee, Lumine)
  SENATE BILL: Firearms Act of 2013 (Law'd) (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: SENATE BILL: Firearms Act of 2013 (Law'd)  (Read 5465 times)
Napoleon
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,892


« on: March 13, 2013, 09:45:38 PM »

Abstain
Logged
Napoleon
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,892


« Reply #1 on: March 16, 2013, 12:34:01 PM »

My apologies for my limited presence in this debate thus far. I am in the process of moving and am struggling to maintain what activity I have been able to. That said, there is no way I can support allowing law enforcement to carry if the general population cannot. Law enforcement is a profession, not a higher level of being. For every Adam Lanza there is a Chris Dorner.

I understand this only applies to federal property. What is the purpose?
Logged
Napoleon
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,892


« Reply #2 on: March 20, 2013, 07:53:38 PM »

I offer an amendment to strike Section 5 entirely.
Logged
Napoleon
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,892


« Reply #3 on: March 23, 2013, 10:47:48 PM »
« Edited: March 23, 2013, 10:52:42 PM by Senator Napoleon »

I must admit I've never understood this argument in relation to gun policy. "This is a very limited proposal that will only prevent a small amount of incidents, why do it at all?!" Because it's a limited and respectful proposal that prevents a small amount of incidents rather than none, guys. That's why.

This is an attempt at snipping off the very tip of a weed when we need to grab and pull it out by the roots. All the attention is on mass shootings, yet those consist of less than 1% of gun murders. To really stop violent crime we need a renewed War on Poverty.

Exactly! I suspect our liberal drug laws have worked toward reducing crime in Atlasia.  And another big step would be to reduce racism and other problems related to law enforcement so they can gain the respect of their communities instead of an antagonistic relationship.
Logged
Napoleon
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,892


« Reply #4 on: March 24, 2013, 09:55:37 AM »

Perhaps we aren't missing the point- there just isn't one.
Logged
Napoleon
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,892


« Reply #5 on: March 25, 2013, 12:08:29 PM »

3-5, I haven't voted yet.
Logged
Napoleon
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,892


« Reply #6 on: March 25, 2013, 09:41:04 PM »

AYE
Logged
Napoleon
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,892


« Reply #7 on: March 27, 2013, 01:26:48 AM »

Didn't Vote (0): ewww its a miracle (not really, it did take the full time)


Only because I waited for Clarence to vote. Tongue
Logged
Napoleon
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,892


« Reply #8 on: March 27, 2013, 11:02:55 PM »

An amendment:

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.
Logged
Napoleon
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,892


« Reply #9 on: March 28, 2013, 09:00:07 PM »


I thought I posted my rationale for proposing this last night...I'm happy you accepted but I still feel I should explain why. I think three is a reasonable number for license that doesn't put too much burden on a citizen trying to exercise something which, to this point, is a constitutional right, while still keeping the spirit of the bill and not making too big of a change.
Logged
Napoleon
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,892


« Reply #10 on: April 02, 2013, 03:02:09 PM »

NAY
Logged
Napoleon
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,892


« Reply #11 on: April 05, 2013, 09:44:12 AM »

Aye
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.028 seconds with 12 queries.