2016: Rick Scott/Rob Portman Vs Hillary Clinton/John Hickenlooper (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 08, 2024, 08:26:14 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2016 U.S. Presidential Election
  2016: Rick Scott/Rob Portman Vs Hillary Clinton/John Hickenlooper (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: 2016: Rick Scott/Rob Portman Vs Hillary Clinton/John Hickenlooper  (Read 7916 times)
Liberalrocks
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,939
United States


Political Matrix
E: -4.90, S: -4.35

P P P
« on: December 31, 2010, 12:40:20 AM »
« edited: December 31, 2010, 12:44:04 AM by Liberalrocks »

I doubt Hickenlooper would be a great running mate on a national ticket...very blah.
I think Clinton would have a fair chance at Nevada and New Mexico with or without a western running mate. Colorado is changing demographically and is currently a permanent swing state. His presence may help a democrat hold that state, however VP coattails are so overrated its sick ! Arizona...no way would still go to the republicans. My view of that states electorate is seriously tarnished in the wake of Brewers re-election despite her false claims of "headless bodies in the Arizona desert" A state that would re-elect her after that is simply voting out of party preference...ie: Republican strength in the state. Scott would carry it by a few points...imo.
Montana would not vote for Clinton...Wisconsin would narrowly and Arkansas would be solidly in her column with possibly West Virginia where her husband is extremely popular and where she trounced Obama overwhelmingly.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.019 seconds with 12 queries.