Why is it that democrats always demand recounts in national presidential races that they have lost? But, republicans graciously conceedconcede? That has always been one little thing that has put me with the republican party. A little thing among a lot of other things.
Because the Republicans are the ones that are committing electoral fraud?
Its that democrats feel entitled to national office. Republicans just go by the verdict of the american electorate. No matter what the outcome is. Republicans submit to the people and just respect their verdict. Democrats feel entitled to elected office, no matter what the american electorate think.
Yeah ok...is that why we still hear Republicans complain about 1960??
2000 Al Gore, 2004 John Kerry, and if McCain had upset Obama, Obama 2008.
First off, I don't think a lot of people are still contesting 2004. I certainly am not, though I think 62,040,610 people were really stupid. But, people live with their decisions...that's why we had 2008.
As to 2000, that's a no-brainer. If the other side of the aisle is still complaining 50 years later for alleged ballot-stuffing in 1960...I am going to complain about 2000 until I am six feet under. 2000 was a classic example of voter suppression and fraud. Not only were votes only counted to the point where Bush won, but voters where also disenfranchised prior to election day through artificial purging of the voting rolls. One name: Katherine Harris, the most despicable and un-democratic woman in America.
....[deep breath]...there, I got that off my chest...