courts
Ghost_white
Junior Chimp
Posts: 6,484
|
|
« on: January 19, 2014, 11:43:55 AM » |
|
No consumption age, but set 16 as a purchase age.
21 (D) Alcohol is evil and must be fought.
If only Americans were as smart as French people.
I don't support Prohibition, but I'm also a Democrat who supports it at 21. 16 is way too young and anyone in their teens could be completely irresponsible with it and get themselves hurt or killed. I'm already 19 and the only time I've ever had a drink(s) was under an Ohio exception for 18 and up that allows you to have small portions as long as it's seen and permitted by a supervised adult. There's stories always on the news about drunk teens behind the wheel, and if they get lucky, a cop will pull them over and save them, but that's not always the case and can end up dead for one stupid decision involving alcohol (also a reasonable argument for being against recreational marijuana).
Literally everyone I know drank before turning 16. If anything, 16 is an acceptable compromise for not abolishing the drinking age altogether. The state has better things to do than lock up some 16 year olds for drinking in their parents' basement and not hurting anyone in the process. Obviously drunk driving laws would remain on the books and would still be in force, but I still think it's pretty ridiculous to argue that people who can legally be employed should not have basic legal rights such as the right to consent to sex, the right to drink and smoke, the right to vote, etc. There are literally no reasonable arguments for being against recreational marijuana, despite the Anti-Fun/#420NO brigade's continued assertions to the contrary.
|