Do the rich and powerful "own" both parties? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 23, 2024, 05:43:28 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  U.S. General Discussion (Moderators: The Dowager Mod, Chancellor Tanterterg)
  Do the rich and powerful "own" both parties? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Do the rich and powerful "own" both parties?  (Read 3704 times)
courts
Ghost_white
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,476
United States


« on: May 30, 2012, 06:10:52 PM »

They're really the same thing. Tell me this: which party opposes the Bush tax cuts?
the democrats
Logged
courts
Ghost_white
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,476
United States


« Reply #1 on: May 30, 2012, 06:57:21 PM »

They're really the same thing. Tell me this: which party opposes the Bush tax cuts?
the democrats

Then why did it pass the Democratic Senate in 2010 81-19? One would think that if the Democrats opposed it, they could have voted against it...
a temporary extension with unemployment insurance and 'working class tax cuts' is not the same thing as supporting the bush tax cuts. don't confuse caution with support of something. also change the avatar, please. we have enough confused people on this site as it is.
Logged
courts
Ghost_white
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,476
United States


« Reply #2 on: May 30, 2012, 07:28:45 PM »

Which one opposes staying in Afghanistan? Which one will actually balance the budget? Which one actually supports gay marriage (not this states decide stuff)?
Democrats. And they'd do the other stuff too, if they weren't spineless cowards.
no
Logged
courts
Ghost_white
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,476
United States


« Reply #3 on: May 30, 2012, 07:31:57 PM »

They're really the same thing. Tell me this: which party opposes the Bush tax cuts?
the democrats

Then why did it pass the Democratic Senate in 2010 81-19? One would think that if the Democrats opposed it, they could have voted against it...
a temporary extension with unemployment insurance and 'working class tax cuts' is not the same thing as supporting the bush tax cuts. don't confuse caution with support of something. also change the avatar, please. we have enough confused people on this site as it is.

Unemployment insurance was part of it, which was put in as part of a compromise deal which also included extending all EGTRRA and JGTRRA cuts, including cuts to tax rates on the non-working classes. And change the avatar to what? The Constitution Party seems like a bunch of theocrats, Greens seem too hippie-ish, there's no real "Other" I'm that attracted to, I'm not joining the party of Bush, I've been politely asked to leave the Democrats, Natural Law Party is weird, and it's lonely as an independent.
you're not a 'right libertarian.' and trust me i don't fit into any political party in the us regardless of what i'm registered as.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.027 seconds with 10 queries.