I really did not expect you to be so authoritarian and radical on this issue. You are one of the very few people I've ever met who apparently thinks it's just fine to superimpose any and all personal beliefs on public policymaking, and that personal religious beliefs trump a secular harm test in all instances of policymaking. That just seems so damn perilous to me, but not to you?
Yikes. That's internally consistent, but it might be the most extreme position I've ever seen on this forum.
Drive-by post here, but I think this result was perfectly expected. The problem at its core, I'll wildly postulate, is that Wulfric simply do not know many people who really veer from his beliefs. Why that's the case should be a personal matter.
All I can say is that, if he's still enrolled in college, trying to play the victim on Atlas Forum instead of meeting others with different narratives on his campus is his loss.
