Countries where the same leaders run, even after losing (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 18, 2024, 09:00:12 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  International General Discussion (Moderators: afleitch, Hash)
  Countries where the same leaders run, even after losing (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Countries where the same leaders run, even after losing  (Read 2768 times)
Foucaulf
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,050
« on: July 02, 2012, 04:15:49 PM »

We've established this is accepted in parliamentary systems. Let's take a look at presidential systems:

-Antonio and Hash already talked about France. I'll add that it is less likely for the same Socialist candidate to run twice following their introduction of U.S.-style primaries.

-Nigeria's ruling PDP hasn't lost power since the end of military rule, but they have a rule which alternates their presidents between Christians and Muslims. The opposition is very much personality based, like military dictator turned perennial candidate Muhammdu Bihari.

-Most Latin American countries have only developed a multiparty democracy in recent years, so politics are still personality-based. During single-party rule countries like Uruguay would have party leaders serving multiple presidencies. Another example is Peru, where parties are essentially outfits of perennial candidates.

-South Korea has political wings as the focus rather than political parties; parties change their name repeatedly and merge with others. Major figures during the democratic transition like Kim Dae-jung - Mr. Sunshine Policy - figured in the democratic process.


The problem is that the presidential system puts so much focus on one personality, so most countries see a bunch of powerful figures fighting back forth or party elites suppressing other factions to maintain their candidate. The States is a special case. The Democrats and Republicans are decentralized, and the political focus is on building coalitions rather than hammering a certain ideology. A presidential candidate climbs to the nomination by assembling a certain coalition, but his defeat gives other factions a window of opportunity to support a different presidential candidate four years later.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.019 seconds with 10 queries.