Foucaulf
Jr. Member
Posts: 1,050
|
|
« on: July 02, 2012, 04:15:49 PM » |
|
We've established this is accepted in parliamentary systems. Let's take a look at presidential systems:
-Antonio and Hash already talked about France. I'll add that it is less likely for the same Socialist candidate to run twice following their introduction of U.S.-style primaries.
-Nigeria's ruling PDP hasn't lost power since the end of military rule, but they have a rule which alternates their presidents between Christians and Muslims. The opposition is very much personality based, like military dictator turned perennial candidate Muhammdu Bihari.
-Most Latin American countries have only developed a multiparty democracy in recent years, so politics are still personality-based. During single-party rule countries like Uruguay would have party leaders serving multiple presidencies. Another example is Peru, where parties are essentially outfits of perennial candidates.
-South Korea has political wings as the focus rather than political parties; parties change their name repeatedly and merge with others. Major figures during the democratic transition like Kim Dae-jung - Mr. Sunshine Policy - figured in the democratic process.
The problem is that the presidential system puts so much focus on one personality, so most countries see a bunch of powerful figures fighting back forth or party elites suppressing other factions to maintain their candidate. The States is a special case. The Democrats and Republicans are decentralized, and the political focus is on building coalitions rather than hammering a certain ideology. A presidential candidate climbs to the nomination by assembling a certain coalition, but his defeat gives other factions a window of opportunity to support a different presidential candidate four years later.
|