Was the 1992 UK Election "a poison pill" for whichever party won (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 10, 2024, 03:29:57 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  International Elections (Moderators: afleitch, Hash)
  Was the 1992 UK Election "a poison pill" for whichever party won (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Was the 1992 UK Election "a poison pill" for whichever party won  (Read 1541 times)
Okay, maybe Mike Johnson is a competent parliamentarian.
Nathan
Moderators
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 34,550


« on: June 29, 2021, 05:31:20 PM »

Tories winning again in 1992 certainly was a total body blow for non-Tories at the time - immediately after the result there were lots of anguished discussions as to whether Labour would ever return to power (something maybe worth recalling just now)

But even though Labour benefited in the slightly longer term, it is still possible to see that GE as one of the most regrettable results since the war (even if not as bad as 2015) And a Labour win then at least would have avoided the toxic cult around Blair, one of the things that hampers the party now.

Is there really still a Blair cult within Labour? I was under the impression that even the right flank of the party has disassociated itself from his personal (if not necessarily policy) legacy. Have I been mistaken about this?
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.029 seconds with 11 queries.