Okay, maybe Mike Johnson is a competent parliamentarian.
Nathan
Moderators
Atlas Superstar
![*](https://talkelections.org/FORUM/IMG/star.gif) ![*](https://talkelections.org/FORUM/IMG/star.gif) ![*](https://talkelections.org/FORUM/IMG/star.gif) ![*](https://talkelections.org/FORUM/IMG/star.gif) ![*](https://talkelections.org/FORUM/IMG/star.gif)
Posts: 34,600
![](./avatars/Socialist/S_NY.gif)
|
![](https://talkelections.org/FORUM/IMG/post/xx.gif) |
« Reply #1 on: December 27, 2020, 02:47:58 AM » |
|
Interesting exchange going on here. I think I agree with Dule. It's useful to have a term to describe a politics that deliberately foregrounds identity-group appeals, just as we have terms for politics that deliberately foreground material self-interest appeals. That is, it's a core leftist conviction that all politics is on some level about who's controlling the economic levers, but believing that is not mutually exclusive with using a term like "class politics" to describe a particular political style. So too with "identity politics".
|