Opinion of Emmanuel Macron

[Okay, maybe Mike Johnson is a competent parliamentarian.]

Vomitrocious.

[Okay, maybe Mike Johnson is a competent parliamentarian.]

Vomitrocious.

I continue to find our diametrically opposite views on, for lack of a better word, politician aesthetic (who we, without-context, like or dislike) to be rather funny. Trump breaks the paradigm in a big way, but still in the overwhelming majority of cases anyone I tend to find likable you'll find unlikable and vice versa.

I find it funny too, especially considering that (failed) tactical five-dimensional chess once induced me to vote to the right of you in a real election, for a candidate who suits your aesthetic better.

[Okay, maybe Mike Johnson is a competent parliamentarian.]

If the "ageist garbage" accusation is directed at me, then there's obviously nothing wrong with being thirty-nine and I don't think anybody, anywhere in our society, would seriously claim that there is; I just think it's insulting that godawful let's-double-down-on-the-last-thirty-years candidates can coast on being young and something approaching conventionally attractive. I've said before that if the substance of Macron's candidacy were in any way revolutionary or transformational then I would get the appeal.