Atlas Sexual Morality Poll (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 05, 2024, 04:44:42 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Forum Community
  Forum Community (Moderators: The Dowager Mod, YE, KoopaDaQuick 🇵🇸)
  Atlas Sexual Morality Poll (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: ?
#1
Question 1: Agree
 
#2
Question 1: Disagree
 
#3
Question 2: Agree
 
#4
Question 2: Disagree
 
#5
Question 3: Agree
 
#6
Question 3: Disagree
 
#7
Question 4: Agree
 
#8
Question 4: Disagree
 
#9
Question 5: Agree
 
#10
Question 5: Disagree
 
#11
Question 6: Agree
 
#12
Question 6: Disagree
 
#13
Question 7: Agree
 
#14
Question 7: Disagree
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 302

Calculate results by number of options selected
Author Topic: Atlas Sexual Morality Poll  (Read 18378 times)
Okay, maybe Mike Johnson is a competent parliamentarian.
Nathan
Moderators
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 34,538


« on: August 13, 2014, 11:42:16 PM »
« edited: August 14, 2014, 12:18:50 AM by asexual trans victimologist »

If memphis wants the rest of us to stop controlling, judging, and demeaning people's sex lives and family practices, then I for one would like to call on him to stop controlling, judging, and demeaning people's gender identities*. He doesn't have the excuse of being a religious conservative or something.

Anyway, disagree on 1, 3, 5, and 6, agree on 4, case-by-case on 2, and I really just cannot but abstain on 7. None of this should surprise anyone. As always, I could perhaps best be described as 'unwilling to fully commit to being [by prevailing forum standards] a socon'.

*for lack of a better term. I've come to think lately that 'gender identity' is a pretty crappy term.
Logged
Okay, maybe Mike Johnson is a competent parliamentarian.
Nathan
Moderators
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 34,538


« Reply #1 on: August 15, 2014, 08:54:50 PM »

Anyway, disagree on 1, 3, 5, and 6, agree on 4, case-by-case on 2, and I really just cannot but abstain on 7. None of this should surprise anyone. As always, I could perhaps best be described as 'unwilling to fully commit to being [by prevailing forum standards] a socon'.

What do you mean by that?

Basically what a few other people have said. If the relationship is committed and at least moving towards being a long-term proposition then I think sharing living space can be a very good idea. Otherwise it seems irresponsible at best.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.028 seconds with 14 queries.