Which Kind of Life Would You Prefer? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 16, 2024, 12:28:57 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Forum Community
  Off-topic Board (Moderators: The Dowager Mod, The Mikado, YE)
  Which Kind of Life Would You Prefer? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: Which of the following scenarios would make you happier?
#1
True Love with Difficulties
 
#2
Comfortable Feelings with an Easy Life
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 56

Author Topic: Which Kind of Life Would You Prefer?  (Read 1467 times)
Okay, maybe Mike Johnson is a competent parliamentarian.
Nathan
Moderators
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 34,576


« on: January 08, 2014, 12:11:55 AM »
« edited: January 08, 2014, 04:21:51 AM by asexual trans victimologist »

Option 1 without hesitation. I have self-destructive tendencies in a lot of my relationships with other people and am thus probably not a great role model in this regard, but life is going to have difficulties no matter what you do and anything promising ease probably has some sort of moral or other catch so I really can't see the point of choosing Option 2.
Logged
Okay, maybe Mike Johnson is a competent parliamentarian.
Nathan
Moderators
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 34,576


« Reply #1 on: January 09, 2014, 08:25:09 PM »

Option 1 without hesitation. I have self-destructive tendencies in a lot of my relationships with other people and am thus probably not a great role model in this regard, but life is going to have difficulties no matter what you do and anything promising ease probably has some sort of moral or other catch so I really can't see the point of choosing Option 2.

Have you ever considered the possibility that morality is self-destructive, Nathan?

In this context? No, and you appear to be having some reading comprehension issues relating to what the word 'but' is doing in that sentence. In other contexts? Of course it is, and that's, in the contexts in which it's true, a good thing. Have you ever considered the possibility that rejecting morality is destructive of things far more important than the self?
Logged
Okay, maybe Mike Johnson is a competent parliamentarian.
Nathan
Moderators
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 34,576


« Reply #2 on: January 10, 2014, 03:53:38 AM »


I must confess I cannot conceive of anything more important than myself, Nathan.

And it is precisely in holding that view that you ensure that almost anybody else on the planet is more important and deserving of respect and concern than you are, opebo.
Logged
Okay, maybe Mike Johnson is a competent parliamentarian.
Nathan
Moderators
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 34,576


« Reply #3 on: January 10, 2014, 05:35:54 AM »

Option 2, it gives you a stronger negotiating position(but not the strongest). The party less invested in the relationship wins it.

I don't think a relationship is something that one is supposed to 'win'.
Logged
Okay, maybe Mike Johnson is a competent parliamentarian.
Nathan
Moderators
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 34,576


« Reply #4 on: January 11, 2014, 05:21:08 PM »

I'll also note that what the 'difficulties' are isn't specified. My mental image was of a kind and loving but persnickety and perhaps irritable person. It honestly seems ridiculous to me to give up true love just because somebody is persnickety and perhaps irritable, but I realize other people may be interpreting the 'difficulties' in different ways.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.031 seconds with 13 queries.