Folks who are 'anti-sex' by your metric are often pro-other things that people at advanced stages of moral development tend to value significantly more than convenient access to orgasms (or money, for that matter), so, you know, that's where the appeal of democracy and populism come in. But you knew that already.
That is not 'advanced', Nathan. Its just arbitrary socialization... ridiculous to value it as 'better' or 'worse' than any other arrangement.
See, you're saying that because you're stuck in a type of moral calculus that's most common among small children.
You precisely make my point - socialization. Its just nonsense you're swallowing during the indoctrination from childhood to adult-cog-in-the-machine-hood, Nathan.What's funny about this accusation is that your way of thinking is probably closer to the mythical 'average person's' than mine is in a lot of ways. Most of the 'indoctrination' that I experience in my daily life would if I succumbed to it make my way of thinking more similar to yours, not less.
It is absurd to equate that with sexual intercourse.
[/quote]
It's also absurd--although maybe on a different level, I don't know--to equate soliciting a prostitute with normal sex, so you started it.[/quote]
No, it is precisely the same act, Nathan.[/quote]
Acts have intents and motives and contexts.
Of course I don't, but I do consider women different from food.
I'm quite sure my analysis is more honest, however.
[/quote]
From your perspective of course it is. From her perspective of course hers was. (She was from Nonthaburi Province, by the way, if that means anything to you.)