MA-Gov: Coakley in (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 02, 2024, 09:34:14 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Gubernatorial/State Elections (Moderators: Brittain33, GeorgiaModerate, Gass3268, Virginiá, Gracile)
  MA-Gov: Coakley in (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: MA-Gov: Coakley in  (Read 6388 times)
Okay, maybe Mike Johnson is a competent parliamentarian.
Nathan
Moderators
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 34,531


« on: September 15, 2013, 05:43:33 PM »

If it ends up being Baker versus Coakley, which it really had better not, I'm pretty sure I'll just write in some member of my family like I do for uncontested House elections.
Logged
Okay, maybe Mike Johnson is a competent parliamentarian.
Nathan
Moderators
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 34,531


« Reply #1 on: September 27, 2013, 02:35:24 PM »


Nooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo
oooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo
oooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo
oooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo
oooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo
oooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo
oooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo
oooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo
oooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo
oooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo
oooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo
oooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo
oooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo
oooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo

Quote from: Restricted
You must be logged in to read this quote.

I am crying.

That stupid bitch Coakley should have just finished her AGship and faded into the sunset after her embarrassing, highly avoidable 2010 loss. Now, if she wins, we are stuck with this dunderhead as Governor for 8 years instead of someone who could have potentially been one of the best Governors this country has ever seen, and who knows if she'll even win? Martha Coakley has a tendency of losing races that should be Democratic locks.
Wow. Please never post about a Republican "war on women" ever.

If there was a male candidate I didn't like I'd call him a stupid bastard. There is nothing sexist happening here. And even if I was sexist, how would that make the chances any lower that Republicans are waging a war on women?

Why can't you just call candidates you don't like stupid 'assholes' or 'jerks' or 'sh**twaffles'?
Logged
Okay, maybe Mike Johnson is a competent parliamentarian.
Nathan
Moderators
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 34,531


« Reply #2 on: September 28, 2013, 04:38:36 PM »


Nooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo
oooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo
oooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo
oooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo
oooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo
oooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo
oooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo
oooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo
oooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo
oooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo
oooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo
oooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo
oooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo
oooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo

Quote from: Restricted
You must be logged in to read this quote.

I am crying.

That stupid bitch Coakley should have just finished her AGship and faded into the sunset after her embarrassing, highly avoidable 2010 loss. Now, if she wins, we are stuck with this dunderhead as Governor for 8 years instead of someone who could have potentially been one of the best Governors this country has ever seen, and who knows if she'll even win? Martha Coakley has a tendency of losing races that should be Democratic locks.
Wow. Please never post about a Republican "war on women" ever.

If there was a male candidate I didn't like I'd call him a stupid bastard. There is nothing sexist happening here. And even if I was sexist, how would that make the chances any lower that Republicans are waging a war on women?

Why can't you just call candidates you don't like stupid 'assholes' or 'jerks' or 'sh**twaffles'?

I could. Coakley is an asshole, a jerk, and a sh**twaffle. How is bitch/bastard any worse than any of those though (besides jerk obviously, because it isn't a curse word)?

'Bitch' is strongly gendered in a way that usually implies that the things wrong with the person being called a bitch have to do with their gender.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.027 seconds with 10 queries.