SENATE BILL: Caucus Infrastructure and Formation Act (law'd)

[Okay, maybe Mike Johnson is a competent parliamentarian.]

Aye.

Why are we even bothering to consider this?

[Okay, maybe Mike Johnson is a competent parliamentarian.]

For what it's worth, I don't inherently disagree with this, I just don't see particularly much point to it.

[Okay, maybe Mike Johnson is a competent parliamentarian.]

Tabling motions are not time wasters.

Napoleon, if this comes to a final vote, I, at least, would appreciate a description of why I should vote No rather than abstaining, since I don't particularly see why we should care too much about this one way or another.

[Okay, maybe Mike Johnson is a competent parliamentarian.]

I see no reason not to, though I maintain my dismay over the somewhat petty way in which parts of this debate were conducted.

Aye.

[Okay, maybe Mike Johnson is a competent parliamentarian.]

I'd be interested in starting up or helping to start up a Labor Caucus within the JCP now if anybody else would.