Northeast Assembly Thread (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 23, 2024, 08:01:31 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Government
  Regional Governments (Moderators: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee, Lumine)
  Northeast Assembly Thread (search mode)
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4
Author Topic: Northeast Assembly Thread  (Read 393798 times)
Okay, maybe Mike Johnson is a competent parliamentarian.
Nathan
Moderators
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 34,490
« Reply #50 on: September 25, 2011, 12:21:55 AM »
Nay
Logged
Okay, maybe Mike Johnson is a competent parliamentarian.
Nathan
Moderators
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 34,490
« Reply #51 on: September 30, 2011, 12:03:48 PM »
Nay.

We should be teaching children not to assume that technology can solve all their problems.
Logged
Okay, maybe Mike Johnson is a competent parliamentarian.
Nathan
Moderators
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 34,490
« Reply #52 on: October 02, 2011, 12:02:49 AM »
I might point out that the Soviet Union was a multinational empire and the nation-states that peeled off from it were just that. Nation-states.

Massachusetts is a region, not a nation-state. The nation-state is the Republic of Atlasia, which has done nothing wrong. Name one way in which Massachusetts or Vermont or any other state in the Northeast is being wronged or oppressed by the Republic of Atlasia (doing things that happen to be politically unpopular in the region does not count, since that's part and parcel of a nation-state being diverse).
Logged
Okay, maybe Mike Johnson is a competent parliamentarian.
Nathan
Moderators
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 34,490
« Reply #53 on: October 04, 2011, 01:44:16 AM »
Look, debate is over, just vote, wormyguy.

Aye.
Logged
Okay, maybe Mike Johnson is a competent parliamentarian.
Nathan
Moderators
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 34,490
« Reply #54 on: October 05, 2011, 03:40:55 PM »
« Edited: October 05, 2011, 03:43:14 PM by Nathan »
Censure is a parliamentary procedure, not a political one. In these cases, it instills the need for respect of oneself and others in public debate.

If we aren't generally going to be in the business of 'censoring' one another's vituperative and infantile attacks during debates, please let me know for the next time a bill that the gentleman from Massachusetts has authored comes to us for consideration.
Logged
Okay, maybe Mike Johnson is a competent parliamentarian.
Nathan
Moderators
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 34,490
« Reply #55 on: October 06, 2011, 12:59:07 PM »
I'm withdrawing the motion of censure but reiterate for the record my disapproval of the gentleman from Massachusetts's debating style and my belief that we in the Northeast Assembly should have stricter guidelines for respecting ourselves and one another in the course of our public business.
Logged
Okay, maybe Mike Johnson is a competent parliamentarian.
Nathan
Moderators
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 34,490
« Reply #56 on: October 06, 2011, 08:27:04 PM »
« Edited: October 07, 2011, 01:15:41 AM by Nathan »
Bills like this are the cancer that is killing representative democracy.

I would like to, not introduce a formal amendment as such, but express my general belief that the resolution should in a better world be changed to read as follows:

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

It has as much chance of passing and is exactly as serious as the original text.
Logged
Okay, maybe Mike Johnson is a competent parliamentarian.
Nathan
Moderators
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 34,490
« Reply #57 on: October 07, 2011, 09:30:18 AM »
He should. It's for rhetorical purposes only.
Logged
Okay, maybe Mike Johnson is a competent parliamentarian.
Nathan
Moderators
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 34,490
« Reply #58 on: October 08, 2011, 02:22:21 PM »
Nay.
Logged
Okay, maybe Mike Johnson is a competent parliamentarian.
Nathan
Moderators
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 34,490
« Reply #59 on: October 11, 2011, 09:31:18 AM »
Aye.
Logged
Okay, maybe Mike Johnson is a competent parliamentarian.
Nathan
Moderators
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 34,490
« Reply #60 on: October 15, 2011, 03:07:56 AM »
I fully support this bill, my only concern being that it might still be a good idea for the governor to make interim appointments (if we can get those to be apolitical that would be good, but probably far easier said than done for obvious reasons) until special elections can be held.
Logged
Okay, maybe Mike Johnson is a competent parliamentarian.
Nathan
Moderators
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 34,490
« Reply #61 on: October 16, 2011, 12:26:53 AM »
Aye.
Logged
Okay, maybe Mike Johnson is a competent parliamentarian.
Nathan
Moderators
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 34,490
« Reply #62 on: October 16, 2011, 12:31:04 PM »

Have you ever voted Aye to anything? At all?
Logged
Okay, maybe Mike Johnson is a competent parliamentarian.
Nathan
Moderators
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 34,490
« Reply #63 on: October 19, 2011, 03:47:39 PM »
Abstain.
Logged
Okay, maybe Mike Johnson is a competent parliamentarian.
Nathan
Moderators
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 34,490
« Reply #64 on: October 20, 2011, 10:38:03 PM »
I'm not sure it's a great idea to put condoms in restrooms. Those places tend to be filthy in schools.

Out of curiosity, is this intended to permit a K-5 or K-8 school to provide condoms as well as 6-8 and 9-12 ones?
Logged
Okay, maybe Mike Johnson is a competent parliamentarian.
Nathan
Moderators
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 34,490
« Reply #65 on: October 22, 2011, 04:26:29 PM »
Aye.

While I would have liked a clarified and amended section 1, I am confident that schools in the region will be at least somewhat judicious in their implementation, if any, of this new allowance.
Logged
Okay, maybe Mike Johnson is a competent parliamentarian.
Nathan
Moderators
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 34,490
« Reply #66 on: October 23, 2011, 05:11:58 PM »
Out of curiosity, is there any kind of government or political action whatsoever of which the gentleman from Massachusetts would actually approve?
Logged
Okay, maybe Mike Johnson is a competent parliamentarian.
Nathan
Moderators
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 34,490
« Reply #67 on: October 26, 2011, 10:53:05 PM »
Congratulations, Winfield. You were a great governor.
Logged
Okay, maybe Mike Johnson is a competent parliamentarian.
Nathan
Moderators
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 34,490
« Reply #68 on: October 30, 2011, 01:24:49 PM »
I'll be supporting Scott.
Logged
Okay, maybe Mike Johnson is a competent parliamentarian.
Nathan
Moderators
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 34,490
« Reply #69 on: November 01, 2011, 01:08:45 PM »
[1] Scott
[3] Wormyguy

[2] Write-in: King Ghamera
Logged
Okay, maybe Mike Johnson is a competent parliamentarian.
Nathan
Moderators
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 34,490
« Reply #70 on: November 05, 2011, 05:57:09 PM »
I'd like to introduce an amendment to remove the apostrophe from section 1.

I fully support this bill.
Logged
Okay, maybe Mike Johnson is a competent parliamentarian.
Nathan
Moderators
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 34,490
« Reply #71 on: November 08, 2011, 03:13:17 AM »
Aye
Logged
Okay, maybe Mike Johnson is a competent parliamentarian.
Nathan
Moderators
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 34,490
« Reply #72 on: November 11, 2011, 12:28:47 AM »
Nay.
Logged
Okay, maybe Mike Johnson is a competent parliamentarian.
Nathan
Moderators
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 34,490
« Reply #73 on: November 13, 2011, 09:45:50 PM »
Aye.
Logged
Okay, maybe Mike Johnson is a competent parliamentarian.
Nathan
Moderators
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 34,490
« Reply #74 on: November 15, 2011, 11:55:58 PM »
I have no objections to Andrew's nomination.
Logged
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.024 seconds with 11 queries.