GOP house gains in 2012? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 10, 2024, 06:48:39 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Congressional Elections (Moderators: Brittain33, GeorgiaModerate, Gass3268, Virginiá, Gracile)
  GOP house gains in 2012? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: GOP house gains in 2012?  (Read 19380 times)
jimrtex
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,817
Marshall Islands


« on: November 08, 2010, 01:07:57 PM »

TX: +3D, +1R(VRA will mandate new Hispanic majority districts)

TX: +3R +1D

The Supreme Court rejected a district that ran from the Rio Grande to Austin with the mere purpose of having a Hispanic majority.  The district court largely rejected districts that ran from the Rio Grande Valley to San Antonio.  Cuellar's district includes a very small portion of Bexar County.  Canseco's district includes West Texas simply because it had to go somewhere, and it is lightly populated.

There simply is not the population on the border to draw another district.  But there has been enough growth to consolidate the districts.  You split Corpus and Brownsville.  The Brownsville district will have to go into Hidalgo to get enough population.  The Hidalgo district may have to move a bit west.  And then you add places like Maverick and Zavala to Cuellar's district.  The Corpus district then includes areas to its north.

Before last week, that would have been a Republican pickup.  Now it is simply a hold.  And the Cameron-based seat is likely a Democratic gain.

You then add 1 seat each in the DFW, Houston, and Central Texas.  In the Houston area, the Green, Green, and Jackson Lee seats barely have enough population as it is.  So the new seat is a Republican seat in the suburbs.  You shift the Doggett seat into Travis County, and then the new seat goes to the east.  It could even end up being the Flores seat.  Carter's seat comes south.  And you create a seat starting in Bell and McLennan county heading north.  That is another Republican seat.  In the DFW area, the extra seat goes in the northern suburbs.
Logged
jimrtex
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,817
Marshall Islands


« Reply #1 on: November 18, 2010, 08:46:49 PM »

I don't that the DOJ can demand more minority-majority districts that are erose, and not dictated by adjacent communities of interest. So I don't see a lot more being demanded myself. But the law in this area is tough to get a handle on. Muon2 keeps reminding me of that, the bastard - he knows just too damn much!  Smiley
I don't think that they can force additional seats under preclearance under Section 5, which is to ensure that there is not retrogression of voting rights.  Perhaps they can require maintenance of proportionality when a state is gaining seats.

What the Supreme Court ruled was that the Austin-McAllen district didn't count as a VRA district, since it was just an attempt to categorize persons by race.  If that district had counted, then it didn't matter what had been done in TX-23.  It appears that the district court extended that and avoided drawing districts linking the border to San Antonio, and this could be considered a precedent in other places.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.017 seconds with 10 queries.