Butler, of course, once infamously argued that her execrable and obscurantist prose style represented a radical act in itself. Certain things are impossible to parody effectively as they're so close to parody in the first place.
Tanaka Mitsu, a Japanese feminist philosopher from the early 70s whom I much admire and have been thinking about a lot lately, said similar things, but the difference is that Tanaka's brand of terrible writing consisted of blazing hot Nietzsche-esque aphorism-takes* and doodles where she confuses GNI and Gini coefficient, which I unironically think is a more respectable way to operate than its Butlerian equivalent on the other side of the #populist 
/#elitist 
x-axis.
*Our own Battista Minola described Tanaka's analysis of The Abortion Issue as "[Inks]ing insane, but in a good way" when I explained it to him.
Side note:
Well this is probably the most interesting thing I'll have learned about today.
