Seattle removes offensive words 'citizen,' 'brown bag' from vocabulary (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 25, 2024, 10:47:48 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  U.S. General Discussion (Moderators: The Dowager Mod, Chancellor Tanterterg)
  Seattle removes offensive words 'citizen,' 'brown bag' from vocabulary (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Seattle removes offensive words 'citizen,' 'brown bag' from vocabulary  (Read 4701 times)
FEMA Camp Administrator
Cathcon
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,377
United States


« on: August 12, 2013, 07:44:17 AM »

Also, as far as I'm concerned, anyone who lives anywhere is a citizen of that city/state/country, regardless of what the Government says.

That...seems like an overbroad definition. Was John McCain a citizen of North Vietnam for 6 years?

1. I'm talking about permanent, living residency, not POW residency.

Surely being in one building for six years constitutes living there? And what about (less hostile example) diplomats or peace workers? Are they citizens of the country where they work? What if someone renounces their citizenship of a political entity but continues to live within its geographical boundaries?

Again, I'm a Utopianist, but in my perfect world, there would be no violence or war. Everyone could live wherever they want. There would be no established nations or states.

The McCain example is a bad one. I'm talking about voluntary permanent, living residency.

What our perfect world resembles is largely irrelevant to whether someone falls under the designation of "citizen" or not.
Logged
FEMA Camp Administrator
Cathcon
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,377
United States


« Reply #1 on: August 12, 2013, 09:43:14 AM »

Lots of brown bags running their mouths in this thread. Why don't you shut up and let the citizens discuss this issue with some maturity?

"Maturity" is an over-rated concept in government, typically used by the landed elite that wish to straddle issues to win re-election rather than discuss the actual philosophical and political implications of their governing style. (See: Nelson Rockefeller, John McCain, Henry M. Jackson, etc.)
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.021 seconds with 10 queries.