I'm not going to debate it here Nym (since the thread says "keep it friendly") but I disagree that there was "lying" in regards to the premise of the war. So yes, it was worth it.
I never said there was, but you are essentially blaming the media for the current state of affairs. If the media portraying what is happening in Iraq is leading to American opinion turning against the war, that would imply that the only way we can win is by lying to the American people in terms of censoring what is actually going on. I don't believe it's morally right to hide the truth from people, and if a war cannot be won without lying about how well things are going, we should seriously reconsider whether or not we are on the right side to begin with. I trust the American people to make the decision about whether or not their tax dollars are being used wisely in Iraq.
Yes, it is not morally right to hide the truth from people, but that is what the media is doing. It is only reporting and exploiting the negative news from Iraq to the point of absurdity. There is a whole different side to the war which rarely gets mentioned by the media, and when it does, people claim that it is propaganda. Well, I'm sorry to admit, but airing nothing but negative information on a situation is also propaganda under that definition then. That's why I say that people's opinion on the war would be different if they actually knew the whole story of what is going on over there.