Fox: British attacks "work to our advantage" (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 15, 2024, 01:31:02 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  International General Discussion (Moderators: afleitch, Hash)
  Fox: British attacks "work to our advantage" (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Fox: British attacks "work to our advantage"  (Read 5240 times)
MODU
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,023
United States


« on: July 07, 2005, 08:30:23 PM »

You're reading too much into this, I'm afraid. The commentator clearly intended to suggest that it is to the "Western world's" advantage to be united when experiencing such an incident.

You don't understand how these people think. Condi said the Tsunami was an "Wonderful Oppurtunity".


Troll.

Anyway, "it works to our advantage" is parallel to what I said in the other tread in regards if this war is being executed properly.  It's not, because a handful of nations cannot possibly police the whole world.  ALL nations have to, and if having an attack occur close to where numerous leaders are meeting, and the former opponents to the global war begin to understand that they are immune to the threat, then yes, it works to our advantage because they might finally start policing themselves.
Logged
MODU
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,023
United States


« Reply #1 on: July 07, 2005, 08:44:47 PM »


Huh? All of the G8 countries were involved with the war on terror in Afganistan. I think all but Russia sent troops. Yes, Canada, France and Germany, those countries that you love to bash sent troops. In fact the US accidentily killed some Canadians there.

You are seriously ed up if you see a terrorist attack near a meeting filled with leaders WHO ALREADY SUPPORT THE WAR ON TERROR as an oppurtunity.

There is a difference between supporting the war in Afghanistan and supporting the war on terror.  The war on terror covers (militarily) Afghanistan, Iraq, the Philippines, Somolia, and Indonesia.  The war on terror covers (diplomatically) Syria, Iran, Lybia (resolved), Sudan, Yemen, Saudi Arabia, Pakistan, North Korea, etc.  Not all in that meeting support the war on terror.
Logged
MODU
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,023
United States


« Reply #2 on: July 07, 2005, 08:59:33 PM »

Where were the terrorists in Iraq before we invaded? already answered that one
What are we doing about terrorism in Saudi Arabia?already answered that one
Pakistan is a bit iffy in their support already addressed that one

Are you undermining the job of the Canadian, French and German troops in Afganistan?


Are going to ask me the same questions over and over (which I responded to less than 24 hours ago, btw)?  Obviously you either don't read what I write or don't remember.

As far as the three countries listed, no, I'm not undermining their efforts one bit.  I am stating that they are not doing enough, as established wealthy nations, to police against terrorism globally (like I already said a few posts ago).
Logged
MODU
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,023
United States


« Reply #3 on: July 07, 2005, 09:19:21 PM »


Yes, that is your opinion, just as it's my opinion that these other nations are failing to live up to their duties as successful Western nations.
Logged
MODU
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,023
United States


« Reply #4 on: July 07, 2005, 09:29:58 PM »

Here's something you probably don't know. After Spain withdrew from Iraq, earning mindless bashing from all of the right-wing corportate media, they sent a bunch of troops to Afganistan. That didn't seem to get reported anywhere. I saw it.  Quit relying on right-wing news sources like Fox, and you'll realize that the situation is more complicated. hehehe . . . believe me, I know how complex the global war is.  However, you're right many countries including the US could be doing more to fight the war on terror. The Iraq war has distracted us from fighting the war on terror (again, your opinion0, and burned up the a lot of good will. On 9/12/01, the French papers said "We are all Americans".
Logged
MODU
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,023
United States


« Reply #5 on: July 07, 2005, 09:56:31 PM »



That's good, but it didn't get much coverage.

True, but it's up to people to be informed and not sit back and expect to be spoon fed news (both liberal and conservative domestic media missed it).

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

Not at all, because I see the war in the big picture.  Afghanistan was the "revenge" strike against those who harborred the largest mass of terrorists which happened to include Bin Laden.  Iraq was our easiest strike in the region for the second side of the war on terror to show that the US means business as well as establish a modern freely elected government to change the political landscape in the region.  As it has been said here . . . the more free the society, the less likely terrorism with grow within their borders.  As a result of Iraq, and strong diplomatic pressure, Lybia caved.  So, it has been successful. 
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.031 seconds with 12 queries.