2018 Congressional Generic Ballot/House Polls Megathread 2 - no debates please (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 01, 2024, 05:51:22 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Congressional Elections (Moderators: Brittain33, GeorgiaModerate, Gass3268, Virginiá, Gracile)
  2018 Congressional Generic Ballot/House Polls Megathread 2 - no debates please (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: 2018 Congressional Generic Ballot/House Polls Megathread 2 - no debates please  (Read 144887 times)
Skill and Chance
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,809
« on: July 14, 2018, 01:31:58 PM »

What do we think is the point at which the House flips?  Probably D+6.5 or so if we are going strictly by the R-held seats with the closest Clinton/Trump numbers.  Increasingly, though, it looks like there are enough Ojedas and McCreadys leading deep in Trump country to make it lower than that.  I would be fairly confident D+5 nationwide flips the House, and under the right circumstances, even D+3-4 could.
Logged
Skill and Chance
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,809
« Reply #1 on: July 14, 2018, 03:10:33 PM »

I really hope we dont find out that a +7 popular vote win isnt enough to flip the house. That would be incredibly demoralizing.

There's enough Conor Lamb types out there keeping Trump districts competitive that I really don't see this happening. 
Logged
Skill and Chance
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,809
« Reply #2 on: July 14, 2018, 03:23:53 PM »

I really hope we dont find out that a +7 popular vote win isnt enough to flip the house. That would be incredibly demoralizing.
It’s highly unlikely, that Democrats would win the popular vote by 7 points and fail to win a House majority. Although, with the final percentages tabulated in California, Democrats won the House vote by 29 points in the jungle primary and only outvoted Republicans in one of their districts (CA-49).

That's actually less than Clinton beat Trump by in CA.
Logged
Skill and Chance
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,809
« Reply #3 on: July 25, 2018, 08:56:54 PM »

Preference for Congress (Marist/NBC)

MI: D+9
MN: D+12
WI: D+8

July 15-19, RVs

Looks like Minnesota could have only one Republican in their delegation come January 2019...

Hopefully....Dems can always gerrymander that district out of existence too

I thought Minnesota has nonpartisan redistricting laws.

Nope, it's the standard legislative process with governor's veto, but there hasn't been unified control in a very long time.  2011 was D Gov/R legislature, 2001 was Independent Gov/D senate/R house, 1991 and 1981 were both R Gov/D legislature.
Logged
Skill and Chance
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,809
« Reply #4 on: September 10, 2018, 08:25:42 PM »

Also, 15?? I can see 10, but 15? Hard to see occur in any scenario

That is assuming Dems do well and perhaps take the Senate this year. Suppose for example Dems pick up NV, AZ, and TN in 2018, and all the Dem incumbents hold on.

In that case, seats that could be lost in a hypothetical Republican 2024 wave include:

NV
AZ
TN
NM
MT
ND
MN
WI
MO
MI
IN
OH
WV
VA
PA
ME
FL

That is 17 seats, and not even counting the possibility of the Republicans picking up a seat in a normally safe Dem state (WA, CA, NJ, etc).

The most likely scenario for 2024 is Dems winning an 8th year itch election after 2 terms of Trump.  The 2nd most likely scenario is a 1st term Dem president winning a pretty easy reelection.  I don't think the dam will break for all of the Trump state Dems in Class I until 2030.  And it's likely that Dems would be able to contest many of the Southern and Plains states that dominate Class II by 2026 or 2032 depending on who holds the WH, which could cancel out the losses.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.022 seconds with 11 queries.