Nate: Don't Pawn Your Lisa Murkowski Gear Just Yet (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 02, 2024, 09:50:50 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Congressional Elections (Moderators: Brittain33, GeorgiaModerate, Gass3268, Virginiá, Gracile)
  Nate: Don't Pawn Your Lisa Murkowski Gear Just Yet (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Nate: Don't Pawn Your Lisa Murkowski Gear Just Yet  (Read 10447 times)
DrScholl
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,363
United States


Political Matrix
E: -5.55, S: -3.30

« on: August 28, 2010, 03:24:43 PM »

If it becomes a three person brawl, then yes, it should be on the watch list. In that situation, anything could happen.
Logged
DrScholl
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,363
United States


Political Matrix
E: -5.55, S: -3.30

« Reply #1 on: August 30, 2010, 10:30:22 PM »


Most of the people who use the word leftist have no idea what it means. More understanding of the political spectrum is needed.
Logged
DrScholl
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,363
United States


Political Matrix
E: -5.55, S: -3.30

« Reply #2 on: August 31, 2010, 09:30:18 PM »

Murkowski just conceded.
Logged
DrScholl
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,363
United States


Political Matrix
E: -5.55, S: -3.30

« Reply #3 on: August 31, 2010, 10:59:37 PM »

I concur, it's not a matter of some of these people being dumb, it's about them being too radical. If the Republicans expect to remain a viable party, they cannot continue to purge moderates.
Logged
DrScholl
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,363
United States


Political Matrix
E: -5.55, S: -3.30

« Reply #4 on: September 01, 2010, 09:21:40 AM »


Really?  You mean the people who ruined the GOP's image in the early Bush years with their prolific spending and lack of any resemblance of fiscal restraint?  There's a reason that Republicans have a far less favorable opinion of their own party than Democrats do.  People respond well to politicians making responsible choices--take a look at McDonnell and Christie in Virginia and New Jersey to see what nominating stalwart Conservatives did to the GOP.  These people are making the spending cuts that moderates considered to be "too extreme" or "too controversial" and are highly popular in their states for doing so.

So if you think the GOP is going to die by daring embracing Conservatism again, I have to one thing to say.  People support elected officials to make actual policy changes--not to get re-elected.  If the getting tangible fiscal restraint means no return to the "Permanent Republican Majority" of the Bush Years, that's fine by me.

You're talking about mismanagement. The Bush Administration and the Republican Congress was very conservative, nothing about them was moderate.

When you have people running around talking about privatizing Social Security, dismantling Medicare, being extremely radical on social issues and lacking dignity and class while doing, that is not mainstream policy that people embrace. I don't really care that they choose to go far-right, it isn't my party, I'm just pointing out facts.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.026 seconds with 10 queries.