What states are the most/least in favor of free trade? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 18, 2024, 01:19:05 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Political Geography & Demographics (Moderators: muon2, 100% pro-life no matter what)
  What states are the most/least in favor of free trade? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: What states are the most/least in favor of free trade?  (Read 2827 times)
Goldwater
Republitarian
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,072
United States


Political Matrix
E: 1.55, S: -4.52

« on: February 12, 2017, 12:12:19 PM »
« edited: February 12, 2017, 12:24:03 PM by Goldwater »

Eh, maybe something like this?:



More in favor of free trade/globalization
More opposed to free trade/globalization
Logged
Goldwater
Republitarian
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,072
United States


Political Matrix
E: 1.55, S: -4.52

« Reply #1 on: February 13, 2017, 11:34:04 AM »

Eh, maybe something like this?:



More in favor of free trade/globalization
More opposed to free trade/globalization

I'd say this is about right, but maybe add the Plains states and Idaho to the free trade column?  I also never really saw Tennessee or South Carolina as protectionist places whatsoever.  Anywho, I'll also suggest that a large majority of Americans don't have strong feelings.  I mean, in 2009, Republican voters were much more in favor of free trade than Democratic voters, but if you chuck Barrack Obama's name onto a trade deal and put it all over the news, you will naturally see those numbers move.

Yeah, most people probably don't have strong feelings about trade. Also, I actually thought I made Tennessee and South Carolina green, so those two were mistakes. Tongue
Logged
Goldwater
Republitarian
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,072
United States


Political Matrix
E: 1.55, S: -4.52

« Reply #2 on: February 13, 2017, 11:46:45 AM »

So, maybe closer to this?



I kind of feel like this map might be overestimating the support for free trade, though I'm not quite sure which green states should be red if that's the case...
Logged
Goldwater
Republitarian
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,072
United States


Political Matrix
E: 1.55, S: -4.52

« Reply #3 on: February 13, 2017, 08:24:58 PM »

So, maybe closer to this?



I kind of feel like this map might be overestimating the support for free trade, though I'm not quite sure which green states should be red if that's the case...

I would put Oregon possibly into the opposition category....

https://www.democracyforamerica.com/site/page/new-polling-oregonian-opposition-to-trans-pacific-partnership-fast-track-au

Huh, interesting. Portland struck me as a place that would generally be welcoming to globalization, but I guess that's not the case.
Logged
Goldwater
Republitarian
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,072
United States


Political Matrix
E: 1.55, S: -4.52

« Reply #4 on: February 15, 2017, 01:38:07 AM »

Eh, maybe something like this?:



More in favor of free trade/globalization
More opposed to free trade/globalization
This looks more like a map of states you like and states you don't like.

Er, not really? If it was, Alaska and Wyoming would certainly be red, while New Mexico and Louisiana would be green. Tongue

As, for the rest of your post, I would assume that you have more knowledge on the subject of Minnesota than me, so I won't even try to argue with you becasue you are probably right. TBH, I was really just going with the logic that the Midwest seems to usually be the most protectionist part of the country, this whole map was just blind guesses without that much thought put into them.
Logged
Goldwater
Republitarian
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,072
United States


Political Matrix
E: 1.55, S: -4.52

« Reply #5 on: February 15, 2017, 02:06:32 AM »

So, based on people's comments here, I think I am seeing a few main issues in my guesses

1. I am overestimating the correlation between large/tech cities and support for free trade
2. I am underestimating the support for trade in certain types of rural areas.
3. I probably have too many sates overall as supporting free trade

With those in mind, attempt number three. Tongue



Logged
Goldwater
Republitarian
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,072
United States


Political Matrix
E: 1.55, S: -4.52

« Reply #6 on: February 15, 2017, 10:29:19 AM »

So, based on people's comments here, I think I am seeing a few main issues in my guesses

1. I am overestimating the correlation between large/tech cities and support for free trade
2. I am underestimating the support for trade in certain types of rural areas.
3. I probably have too many sates overall as supporting free trade

With those in mind, attempt number three. Tongue





Pretty good map overall, and I believe I forgot to thank you for starting this thread.... Smiley

Well, that thanks would be misplaced, since I didn't start this thread, I just kind of hijacked it. Tongue
Logged
Goldwater
Republitarian
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,072
United States


Political Matrix
E: 1.55, S: -4.52

« Reply #7 on: February 15, 2017, 11:53:19 AM »


Says the guy who supported Trump. Wink
Logged
Goldwater
Republitarian
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,072
United States


Political Matrix
E: 1.55, S: -4.52

« Reply #8 on: February 15, 2017, 12:04:18 PM »


Well, when your opponent is anti-free trade, too, I guess you can vote on other things, huh? Smiley

Eh, I would argue that Hillary flip-flopped so much that she can't really be called consistently anti-free trade, of course Trump has also flip-flopped on most things too so w/e...
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.045 seconds with 10 queries.