Pacific Proposition-Official MCS (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 16, 2024, 06:07:39 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Elections (Moderators: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee, Lumine)
  Pacific Proposition-Official MCS (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Pacific Proposition-Official MCS  (Read 1166 times)
King
intermoderate
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 29,356
United States


« on: January 16, 2005, 07:24:49 PM »

I like the Pacific's sudden interest in active government. Wink
Logged
King
intermoderate
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 29,356
United States


« Reply #1 on: January 30, 2005, 09:27:03 PM »

The Pacific Statute on Prescription Medication will be on the ballot.

This reminds me, on real life state initiatives, instead of the actual legislation being presented on the ballot, the Secretary of State (in this case, LT. Governor) puts a summary of what the bill is so voters understand it better.

Example: "Shall the Pacific Government...?"

I think we should do that, especially when this bill is a little long.
Logged
King
intermoderate
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 29,356
United States


« Reply #2 on: January 30, 2005, 09:34:10 PM »

You should definitely still do what Ernest does and link the actual text on the ballot.

Yes we should, but some voters might not understand what the bill means by reading the legislative language. It's important to include a summary that clearly shows them what they are voting for.
Logged
King
intermoderate
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 29,356
United States


« Reply #3 on: February 01, 2005, 05:35:20 PM »

The problem with such summaries is that they can easily end up a wee bit biased...I'd rather not, frankly.
I suppose in real life nowadays the Lt.Gov. department legal staff takes care of not doing that...that wasn't always the case though. In the 1870's in Arkansas, the state constitution had to be changed to make some land grants to a railroad company constitutional. The official ballots were marked "For Railroads" and "Against Railroads".

Well, we can get an outside source to write it. I want informed voters!
Logged
King
intermoderate
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 29,356
United States


« Reply #4 on: February 04, 2005, 07:11:30 PM »

Why don't you hold a speech explaining it?

?
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.024 seconds with 10 queries.