Huntsman: Earth not flat; Christie: Sun does not revolve around Earth (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 31, 2024, 11:00:13 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  U.S. General Discussion (Moderators: The Dowager Mod, Chancellor Tanterterg)
  Huntsman: Earth not flat; Christie: Sun does not revolve around Earth (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Huntsman: Earth not flat; Christie: Sun does not revolve around Earth  (Read 11218 times)
King
intermoderate
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 29,356
United States


« on: August 21, 2011, 01:56:03 PM »

I'm curious to hear Bachmann and Gingrich on these issues...


Oh wait. No, actually I don't want to know.

I imagine Gingrich believes in evolution and the Earth revolving around the Sun, but knows Republicans taking the counter on this relative non-issue gives him a solid voting block of dumbs to pass his own agenda.  People like Bachmann, Naso, and Teabaggers are no more than tragic accidents of a 30 year Republican electoral agenda.  This is why the establishment is so shocked.  They never thought people who actually believed this crap could gain power.


No, it shows that the general populous is scientifically literate regardless of political affiliation (almost all of those results are within MOE of each other in a likely low quality poll), but a large group of blindly pastor controlled Americans has been sadly told to disregard biology.  Thankfully, Genesis is the only book in the Bible that seriously conflicts any major scientific theory.
Logged
King
intermoderate
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 29,356
United States


« Reply #1 on: August 21, 2011, 02:26:24 PM »


Interestingly the leader of one of the Dutch left wing parties is a young earth creationist.

Of course she uses it to justify the exact opposite of Republicans, that that is why we should have respect for the planet and all its life.

Republicans do have a point.  If Genesis is correct, then so is Revelations and why bother carrying on when we are all doomed?
Logged
King
intermoderate
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 29,356
United States


« Reply #2 on: August 22, 2011, 04:18:55 PM »

Subsects of geology (aka oil exploration) and nuclear engineering are likely the only sciences that vote majority Republican, though they are probably 'moderate Republicans' for the most part and just support the GOP in economic self interest.
Logged
King
intermoderate
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 29,356
United States


« Reply #3 on: August 24, 2011, 10:53:32 PM »

Genesis 1 can fit in with an evolutionist view (i.e. the water teeming with life was bacteria; the animals Adam no longer enjoyed and felt lonely with before God made Eve were the apes).  Genesis 2 is the weird one.

Logged
King
intermoderate
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 29,356
United States


« Reply #4 on: August 25, 2011, 12:02:17 AM »

jmfcst, what position are you advocating here?  I can't really tell.  

Although, I really don't care much either.
Logged
King
intermoderate
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 29,356
United States


« Reply #5 on: August 25, 2011, 12:31:41 AM »

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-2027558/Scientists-undo-evolution-create-chicken-maniraptora-snout.html?ito=feeds-newsxml
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.017 seconds with 9 queries.