Free Speech, Texas v. Johnson (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 18, 2024, 11:55:41 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Discussion
  Constitution and Law (Moderator: Okay, maybe Mike Johnson is a competent parliamentarian.)
  Free Speech, Texas v. Johnson (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: The ruling was...
#1
Constitutionally sound
 
#2
Constitutionally unsound
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 28

Author Topic: Free Speech, Texas v. Johnson  (Read 11425 times)
Emsworth
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,054


« on: November 29, 2005, 04:32:54 PM »

Constitutionally sound.

The public burning of objects--whether flags or anything else--might in certain circumstances be prohibited for environmental reasons. However, the purpose of the Texas statute was obviously not to protect against pollution. It was to repress the burning of a specific object due to its symbolic value. This regulation of speech is inconsistent with the First Amendment.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.017 seconds with 14 queries.