The Federalist: What Would Constitute A Red Wave In 2014? (Answer: R+8 in Sen) (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 16, 2024, 02:59:04 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Congressional Elections (Moderators: Brittain33, GeorgiaModerate, Gass3268, Virginiá, Gracile)
  The Federalist: What Would Constitute A Red Wave In 2014? (Answer: R+8 in Sen) (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: The Federalist: What Would Constitute A Red Wave In 2014? (Answer: R+8 in Sen)  (Read 726 times)
Del Tachi
Republican95
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,078
United States


Political Matrix
E: 0.52, S: 1.46

P P P

« on: August 05, 2014, 03:27:36 PM »

I think if Colorado is won by Gardner, then its a wave. If the GOP can win an uphill battle against a decent incumbent, that's usually a good sign (Like McCaskill winning against Jim Talent in '06). I agree that its somewhere around R+9 or 8.

Iowa would probably fall for the GOP before Colorado.  There are 7 vulnerable democratic senate incumbents in states that voted for Romney in 2012, so assuming that all of those seats flip to the GOP then only one of NH, VA, MI, IA, CO or OR has to fall in order to make it a "wave."  Iowa seems the most likely to do that.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.031 seconds with 12 queries.