Which of these 2016 Democratic Candidates do you support?

[feeblepizza]

Schweitzer because he's the most conservative. If not, I would gladly vote for Bayh.

[feeblepizza]

Russ Feingold could easily lose this fall.

No, he can't.

If Dave Westlake were nominated, then he would win a landslide. But he only has a 3-point lead over Ron Johnson, and then he only polls at 49. So he very well could loose.

[feeblepizza]

Feingold. He actually has some principles, which is pretty damn rare for a Democratic Senator.

Franken?

No. Franken is a sleazeball.

[feeblepizza]

Feingold. He actually has some principles, which is pretty damn rare for a Democratic Senator.

Franken?

No. Franken is a sleazeball.

Why? He's funny and he's a good Senator.

He cheated on Frannie and was a major crackhead in the 80s. And he lost his funniness sometime in the 90s. And no, he's not a good Senator.

[feeblepizza]

Feingold. He actually has some principles, which is pretty damn rare for a Democratic Senator.

Franken?

No. Franken is a sleazeball.

Why? He's funny and he's a good Senator.

He cheated on Frannie and was a major crackhead in the 80s. And he lost his funniness sometime in the 90s. And no, he's not a good Senator.

If you're going to say Franken cheated on his wife and used drugs, then I need some reliable sources or I'm not going to believe that. And Franken is a better Senator than Norm Coleman.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Al_Franken#Saturday_Night_Live
Maybe not cheating, but definatley drugs.

[feeblepizza]

If there is a candidates the Democrats coalesce around, it should be Hillary Clinton. My scenario goes like this, Joe Biden will be persuaded by Barack Obama sometime in early 2012, I believe it could be February to swap positions with Hillary Clinton. He will resign the Vice Presidency, be quickly confirmed by the Senate for his new position at the State Department. Obama will invoke the 25th amendment, nominate Clinton for Vice President. Her confirmation prospects are problematic, especially if as current polls predict the House is controlled by Republicans. But I think she should get it, therefore as they enter the election sweep stakes they do so as Incumbents. The Democrats will give Obama and Clinton a coronation at there convention in Charlotte, North Carolina. I think it will be a tough race, but in the end Obama will prevail by a bigger than expected margin of victory (Possibly on the scale of LBJ's 1964 triumph) Clinton will be in the envious position of being free enough to go on extended fund-raiser tours for her expected campaign for the 2016 campaign and like Dick Nixon in '60, Humphrey in '68, Bush in '88 and Gore in 2000 she will be the quaisi incumbent and will encounter as many advantages as disadvantages. I think the Republicans will turn to Jeb Bush as there savior on the basis of his strong convention speech in Tampa in 2012, but also in retrospect after eight years of Obama, George W. Bush will be seen in a more kinder light and Bush is a brand name and therefore not the curse it was years before, Republicans see Jeb Bush as his own man and Hillary Clinton will be under pressure to perform in a way she never expected. Clinton will pick Mark Warner of Virginia to be her ticket mate, while Bush will go with Governor John Kasich of Ohio. The election will hinge on a handful of states and could be a repeat of 2000 for its closeness.

Clinton/Warner vs. Bush/Kasich would be a major landslide for Hillary.