If I was any calmer, I might have no pulse; but funny isn't it? Not a response, to counter my assertion, because I guess when you are right, well then there's no argument. Just had to make an observation, that this body notices what many other also likely noticed.
Normally I just ignore you, but I'm procrastinating from studying, so I'll humor you.
First of all, the right wing anger over the Benghazi attack is not based in any real outrage or remorse for the lives lost, it's all an effort to pin some scandal on Obama to hurt his reelection chances. Everyone can see right through it and its disgusting. As for the media, they're not reporting on it because there are no clear answers. Unlike the right wing, they are showing restraint and not throwing out speculation and blame over a very sad and tragic event, as it should be. The media loves getting a good scoop and they don't care who it reflects poorly on, so if they had definitive answers about Benghazi they would report on it. This is like Journalism 1101, not sure what's so complicated about it.
I'm a journalism major, taught by some very esteemed journalists, and frankly it offends me when right wing trolls like yourself accuse accomplished journalists of liberal bias simply because they report on facts that don't always fit your narrative. That's what good journalists do. When Romney puts out a false as, they will check him, as they have done with Obama's campaign as well. It seems to me that right wingers are actually the ones that demand a huge slant from their news and get pissy when good journalists report things like, I don't know, the truth? It's the classic example of projection.
