RIP Dave’s Redistricting App (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 21, 2024, 03:22:00 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Political Geography & Demographics (Moderators: muon2, 100% pro-life no matter what)
  RIP Dave’s Redistricting App (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: RIP Dave’s Redistricting App  (Read 2600 times)
Kevinstat
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,825


« on: February 24, 2020, 11:33:00 PM »

Being from a 2-CD state where redistricting hasn't been particularly partisan (it was a bit more so and threatened to be a lot more so in 2011), I've never really cared that much about PVIs.  For me, a bigger problem was with some of the building blocks.  Maine has had fairly useless census-designated "voting districts" in the past, and it looks like it will continue to in 10 of Maine's 16 counties (one voting district per county actually, which might actually be better than the convoluted "voting districts" of the past, and in the other 6 counties (York, Cumberland, Sagadahoc, Androscoggin, Kennebec and Waldo) they'll be really good (municipalities and wards for cities with multiple wards with separate polling places), but the other 10 counties having no smaller building blocks will likely drive people here nuts).

Block Groups which has also been an option on the app (although that may be without the PVI data) have been better in Maine, but you still have multiple small towns in one block group or the odd case of Lovell and Sweden in Oxford County with two block groups in those two towns, one consisting of about half of Lovell and the other consisting of the other half of Lovell and all of Sweden.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.019 seconds with 13 queries.