NC-07: McIntyre retiring. (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 03, 2024, 11:53:46 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Congressional Elections (Moderators: Brittain33, GeorgiaModerate, Gass3268, Virginiá, Gracile)
  NC-07: McIntyre retiring. (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: NC-07: McIntyre retiring.  (Read 2247 times)
Nichlemn
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,920


« on: January 08, 2014, 03:52:25 PM »

Better to shed these red seats and put the money towards other seats. This frees up more money for competitive offense seats, including the ones that are open.

lol no. It also frees up money on the other side, so unless there's a big asymmetry it's a wash.

Also, it's funny that Republicans are considered delusional when they want to primary a "RINO" with a conservative in a swingy-to-blue area, yet Democrats openly endorsing Democrats losing seats is somehow reasonable.
Logged
Nichlemn
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,920


« Reply #1 on: January 08, 2014, 04:34:02 PM »

Better to shed these red seats and put the money towards other seats. This frees up more money for competitive offense seats, including the ones that are open.

lol no. It also frees up money on the other side, so unless there's a big asymmetry it's a wash.

Also, it's funny that Republicans are considered delusional when they want to primary a "RINO" with a conservative in a swingy-to-blue area, yet Democrats openly endorsing Democrats losing seats is somehow reasonable.

Which party actually follows through more frequently--Democrats, or Republicans? There lies the difference.

I'm talking merely about attitudes.
Logged
Nichlemn
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,920


« Reply #2 on: January 11, 2014, 08:37:58 PM »
« Edited: January 11, 2014, 08:45:57 PM by Nichlemn »

The money argument makes no sense, because competitive races draw money away from both sides. Only if there was a big asymmetry in funding (and there isn't) could it matter. But even then, it still wouldn't be a good thing for McIntyre to retire because national Democrats could always had the option of not spending any money on him and letting him fend for himself, which is better than not spending any money on the race because it's hopeless. You would have to think that the DCCC has been making colossal errors in spending for you to consider it a good thing that McIntyre retired.
Logged
Nichlemn
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,920


« Reply #3 on: January 12, 2014, 05:50:18 AM »

The money argument makes no sense, because competitive races draw money away from both sides. Only if there was a big asymmetry in funding (and there isn't) could it matter. But even then, it still wouldn't be a good thing for McIntyre to retire because national Democrats could always had the option of not spending any money on him and letting him fend for himself, which is better than not spending any money on the race because it's hopeless. You would have to think that the DCCC has been making colossal errors in spending for you to consider it a good thing that McIntyre retired.

I simply said they aren't worth the party's money. Whether they run again is their decision.

Maybe so if a dollar spent on them has just as large an impact as a dollar spent on any other candidate, but this isn't the case. I imagine that NC-07 has relatively cheap campaigns compared to other potentially competitive seats. So the difference between McIntyre and his Republican opponent might be less than in some other races, but a small contribution could have much more impact than the same contribution to another race which is already approaching sharply diminishing returns.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.021 seconds with 12 queries.