Why were there no presidents born in the 1950's/1930's/1810's? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 09, 2024, 06:15:55 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Presidential Election Trends (Moderator: 100% pro-life no matter what)
  Why were there no presidents born in the 1950's/1930's/1810's? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Why were there no presidents born in the 1950's/1930's/1810's?  (Read 3645 times)
Nichlemn
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,920


« on: July 04, 2013, 10:01:23 PM »

Mostly, luck. Given there's been approximately two Presidents per decade over the country's history, it's statistically likely that a few decades will not have had a President born in them even if there's zero relationship between birth year and likelihood of becoming President. There probably is some relationship (see Malcolm Gladwell's Outliers for how birth year matters in various fields), but with such a small sample size there isn't much significance to the data we have.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.016 seconds with 12 queries.