2017-2025 Scott Walker
2025-2029 Carly Fiorina
2029-2033 Kamala Harris
In a realignment period trending against their party, which took effect with Barack Obama's first-term election from 2008, the Republicans aren't going to string together three consecutive presidential victories.
I disagree with the premise.
You're allowed to feel that you "disagree." But, go back to the previous realignments of 1800–1824 (Democratic–Republican), 1828–1856 (Democratic), 1860–1892 (Republican), 1896–1928 (Republican), 1932–1964 (Democratic), and 1968–2004 (Republican) and cite an example of the out party having won three consecutive election cycles.
Texas sharpshooter fallacy. Of course if you go back retroactively, periods in which the roulette wheel chooses the red several times in a row are not going to have three blacks in a row. That has no statistical bearing on the future though. Unless you can provide some inherent reason why there should be merit to such 40 (36? 28?) year cyclic behavior, I shall continue to regard it as as valid as astrology.
Realignments are not “fallacies.”
I will let you do your own research—assuming you’re capable—which should be a help to you.
Damn dude, calm the f[inks] down, no need to be so rude.
